Categories
ASEAN Environment

[567] Of Malaysia offers Indonesia aid and what Malaysians should do

Amid this noxious state, Malaysia has finally offered aid to Indonesia. According to Reuters:

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 10 (Reuters) – Malaysia offered on Wednesday to help neighbour Indonesia extinguish forest fires that have smothered Kuala Lumpur in a thick pall of smoke for a week, aggravating traffic and health conditions.

It’s about time and Indonesia better accept it.

In any case, there was a short rain just now here in Kuala Lumpur. Unfortunately, the rain did little to relieve the worsening condition. The has been relentless.

And while the government finally seems to be crawling in the right direction, we as Malaysians should help out. Instead of moaning how bad the situation really is, start out by not driving and take up public transportation instead. Or at least carpool. If you are whinning but still drive an SUV even to get to the nearest convenience store, just stfu because you have just forfeited your right to bitch.

Another thing we could do is to inform our reps of ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution and how Indonesia has yet to ratify it.

Categories
Activism ASEAN Environment Photography

[566] Of Malaysian Bloggers against haze

Being back in Malaysia is beginning to be a very horrible experience and it’s all due to the . The haze has been worsening and it’s expected to last well into October. On top of that, with the current dry season, there might be water rationing in approximately two weeks if rain doesn’t pour down. Isn’t that sweet?

Haze is the buzz word in the Malaysian blogosphere currently. Everywhere you go, it’s there. It’s kind of expected since bloggers are kind of zeitgeists – bloggers are humans and they tend to talk about everything that is current. So I figure, hell, let’s take a tour of haze loving people by sweeping through the Project Petaling Street.

First stop, jon choo’s weblog with entry OMG Haze!!! This blog criticizes others for blaming Indonesia for the haze. He states that in one of the last, what’s becoming annual, haze, Malaysian companies were involved in open burning in Indonesia. For that reason, Malaysian should not blame Indonesia but instead, look into the mirror.

I however disagree with the blog’s punch line. While I do disagree with placing the blame entirely on Indonesia’s shoulder, Indonesia does share an elephant size of the blame. Reason is that Indonesia has been reluctant and unable to enforce no open burning rule within its territories. And even if Malaysian plantation companies are the culprits, enforcement falls on Indonesia’s hand, not Malaysia’s. In fact, I don’t mind if the Indonesian government want to sue those companies. Heck, if Indonesia could sue Newmont – which is one of the largest extraction conglomerates in the world for various environment damages – I’m sure Indonesia could do that same to any company that is related to the cause of the haze.

On the Malaysian side, at least there are enforcements against open burning. In fact, Malaysia doesn’t impose death penalty on illegal clearing while Indonesia does and yet enforcement makes the difference. If I wouldn’t know any better, the word enforcement might mean the word joke in Bahasa Indonesia.

Second on the inspection is Shagadelica. This blog laments on how the government does not plan to make the Air Pollution Index public. I share the same sentiment. The government should just release the readings just like what has been done with AP list.

And then, there’s A Spicy Life which talks about health tips. A commendable effort but I’m afraid we are already dead.

Even minishorts talks about haze! Do you realize what does this mean? It’s like Bush commenting on Michigan affirmative action admission policy! But then, a couple sentences later, I realized that she doesn’t actually talk about haze per se. So, it’s more like Menj trying to talk about religious freedom but instead ended talking about nonsense and then calling others morons.

However, I’m being unfair since I haven’t read the whole thing and I don’t plan to read that entry. Maybe even the minishorts – Menj comparison isn’t suitable. After all, minishorts is much more lovable than Menj.

After minishorts, here comes the most original idea by HodgePodge I Am. The blog hints that this might be an Indonesian conspiracy to screw Malaysia! BJ Thoughts shares the same idea of conspiracy though this blog tries to explain the idea more thoroughly.

Nilesh Babu thanks Indonesia for this uninspiring gift and notes that Cyberjaya and Wangsa Maju are practically being eaten by smog.

mental jog on the other hand talks about a hazy article by The Sun.

And a picture worth a thousand word. osaya 2nite has a picture to describe how bad the haze is. Observe the distance between the camera and the object of interest. dDoinkster Speaks offers another picture while Rajan has kind words for the Indonesian authority.

And finally, another picture by xes.

With the roundup done, do you know what we should do right now?

We should all organize a “Malaysian Bloggers against haze” and write a letter to our rep or even phone them. In that letter or phone call, tell the rep about ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution and urge him or her to urge the Parliament to urge Indonesia to have a goddamn urgency to ratify this urgent environmental treaty urgently, or urgently, else. Tell them, that we don’t f care about the AP right now, that we don’t f care about security on Malacca Straits at the moment, that we don’t f care about Myanmar currently, that we don’t f care for a lot of other things but we do f care about choking ourselves to our f death.

If you don’t know who represents you, the Malaysian Parliament has a complete list though they don’t seem to offer us the reps’ email address.

So, what are you waiting for? Get your urgent ass off your urgent chair and do something urgent, urgently.

p/s – oh yeah, happy belated ASEAN day, chickens.

pp/s – Roadkill, what seems to be a Singaporean, offers reading on pollution index by Singapore’s National Environment Agency. If we couldn’t rely on our own goverment to provide pollution reading, maybe should rely on Singapore’s and become Singaporeans themselves!

ppp/s – photo from Keramat, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

The Petronas Twin Towers, on an average day, could be seen in between the condominium and the trees.

That apartment building I reckon is about 200 meters away.p4/s – the Malaysia Department of Environment has finally made the Air Pollution Index public. It has been kept secret before this and there were growing discontent towards the government policy.

Categories
Economics Environment Science & technology

[565] Of spurious carbon emission reporting?

I’ve just read a piece written by Beth Romulo and published by Philippines-based Manila Bulletin Online regarding the new Asia-Pacific Partnership for Clean Development and Climate.

I have no problem with the article save one point:

The new agreement is not intended to replace the Kyoto protocol, Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick explained, when the agreement was announced, but to complement it, by bringing in the developing countries, and offering them the most modern technology to help lower emissions. Despite the fact that the US did not ratify the Kyoto pact, it has proceeded voluntarily and been able to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 0.3 percent while the EU’s 25 members have increased to 3.4 percent.

Wow. According to him, the US has been able to reduce carbon emission by 0.3%. Moreover , that sentence that touches on US vs. EU emission is written as weaselly as it could be written.

Why is it spurious?

The author says that there is a drop but fails to give the time frame. Is it year to year basis? Is it 2005 against 1990?

According to BBC, “the US carbon dioxide emissions have increased to more than 15% above 1990 levels.” Moreover, Washington Post says the US 2004 emission level has increased by 1.7%.

I could give him a benefit of a doubt and assume he meant a reduction for the year 2005 (despite that there are 5 more months before the year ends). However, mind you at the same time that the US targets 18% reduction in emission intensity, not reduction of 18% of emission level. There is a huge different in intensity and level and this is where the US has been able to do. The US has been able to reduce the intensity and I think the author of the article us confused with the two terms.

More about emission intensity from the same article by Washington Post:

Connaughton, the chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality, and other administration officials said they are focused on obtaining practical commitments industrialized countries can meet without damaging their economies. He said that although some G-8 countries are struggling to meet their goal of bringing greenhouse gas emissions down to 1990 levels by 2012, the United States is on track to fulfill its pledge to reduce its carbon intensity — how much emissions are rising relative to overall economic growth — 18 percent by 2012.

On Thursday, the Energy Information Administration announced that the nation’s carbon emissions rose 1.7 percent in 2004 — but that amounted to a 2.6 percent drop in carbon intensity, because the U.S. economy grew 4.4 percent that year. The rate of increase in U.S. carbon emissions more than doubled from 2003 to 2004 because of heightened economic activity.

Now, I’m not saying reducing in emission intensity undesireble. Quite the contrary, any reduction is good to me. But this Beth Romulo needs to recognize which is which or else, misinformation might be spread out whenever he writes anything about greenhouse gases emission.

Categories
ASEAN Economics Environment

[561] Of haze and the need to invade Indonesia

There was one time when I could see the Petronas Twin Towers clearly from my home in Kuala Lumpur. At the moment however, the view is kind of hazy, no thanks to Indonesia.

In ASEAN, there is a treaty known as Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution (pdf). Basically, it encourages parties of the treaty to cooperate with each other in combating haze. As of August 2005, seven ASEAN members have ratified the agreement. They are Brunei, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. It is, however too bad that none of the parties is a major contributor to the – the one prime source of this haze, Indonesia, has yet to ratify the treaty.

ASEAN members need to pressure Indonesia into signing this treaty. Forget about Myanmar’s progress towards democracy for awhile. I don’t think Malaysians and indeed Singaporeans should care for Myanmar if we all are going to choke ourselves to death with Indonesian smog. We should criticize Indonesia first and Myanmar second unless Myanmar somehow gets some sort of nuclear warhead from North Korea.

ASEAN politicians have praised Indonesia for reducing open burning in Sumatra. But surely, praise or no praise, Indonesia is not doing enough. ASEAN’s worst haze happened in 1998 and since then, several ASEAN members have themselves covered by smog yearly. More needs to be done and Indonesia’s ratification of the transboundary haze pollution treaty is a great jumpstart towards improving the air quality in Southeast Asia.

If Indonesia lacks the resources needed to implement enforcement against open burning, I’m sure Malaysia and Singapore and even Brunei could offer assistance in term of manpower and monetary aid.

If nothing could convince Indonesia to tie up its shoelaces, then Malaysia and Singapore should team up and invade Indonesia, divide Sumatra among themselves and solve this haze problem once and for all.

Or, we, about 25 million Malaysians plus a couple millions of Singaporeans could together take a deep breath and blow the haze towards Jakarta. Let’s see if they like their own shit.

Or the Malaysian government could build fat ass fans that could redirect the haze towards Jakarta. Or at least until all the haze reaches Singapore… err, I mean Indonesia.

God, this haze thing is driving me nut.

p/s – Oh, if you are reading this David, don’t let Monika read this. Else, the grand scheme to grab Sumatra would fail!

pp/s – I’m moving to a new host soon. So, please bookmark www.maddruid.com instead of my current url.

Categories
Economics Environment

[559] Of King Kong vs. Godzilla

When I was taking labor economic last year, my professor presented a case in class concerning monopsony meeting monopoly and dubbed it, in theory, it’s like King Kong versus Godzilla. I bursted into laughter immediately.

In retropect, I’m not sure whether I laughed because of his figurative presentation, or the truth behind it.

In the real world, the war between a real King Kong and Godzilla has begun; Microsoft versus Google. Of course, none of them are monopsonies but both of them are monopolies. They do hold considerable market power to themselves.

SEATTLE – In a simmering legal tussle, Google Inc. is asking a judge to reject Microsoft’s bid to keep a prized research engineer from taking a job at the Internet search company, saying the software titan filed its lawsuit to frighten other workers from defecting.

Anyway, some sort of climate change agreement between the US and five other Pacific rim nations have been signed prior to ASEAN + 3 + Australia + New Zealand meeting in Laos.

WASHINGTON – The United States and five Asian and Pacific nations, including China and India, agreed Wednesday on a partnership to use cleaner energy technologies in hopes of curtailing climate-changing pollution.

The goal is noble but the problem is, this agreement is non-binding. Because it is non-binding, I suspect there will be freerider problem – which hardly solve Kyoto’s flaw to start with.

With Kyoto, all non-Annex 1 members, including China and India, are not binded to emission reduction and hence, freeriding others’ effort to combat climate change.