Categories
Economics Environment Politics & government Sports

[702] Of statism and Malaysia Airlines

Yesterday, Malaysia Airlines’ (MAS) new managing director, Idris Jala announced that MAS will move out of its headquarters in Kuala Lumpur in effort to cut cost. This might signal an eventual sale of the building. Today, Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister made known that the government won’t interfere with MAS operation. This is good news.

Several weeks ago, when Idris Jala brought up the possibility of selling MAS HQ building in Kuala Lumpur, politicians, some senators from the Dewan Negara and other old dogs were up in arms, harping at Idris Jala for even considering the matter. After all, MAS is Malaysia’s national air carrier, much like how Proton is Malaysian national car manufacturer. It’s national pride and the sale of MAS building could dent that pride. Hence, their reaction is comprehensible. Their opposition however is irrational.

Pride rarely has a place in business, especially when it gets tough. More often than not, a person, an entity or whatever has to swallow its pride and get on with it. What’s better or the best option won’t necessarily feed one’s ego. MAS is facing this dilemma and Idris Jala realizes this. He deserves respect for simply being able to perceive the scenario and look beyond pride. The politicians that disagree with Idris Jala deserve a kick for putting too much emphasize on pride.

The government should mostly do what it does best and that is governing. Government intervention on MAS is unneeded and unwanted. Malaysian government should learn something from Singapore Airlines – the firm, despite being linked to the government, must be free to work out its own strategy.

Pride won’t save MAS and neither will politicians that oppose the sale. These politicians are a bunch of statists. Do we really expect these statists to know more about MAS than the managing director himself?

No. Unless, if the politicians themselves have proper background in business. But that’s rarely the case, isn’t it?

p/s – the price of internalizing pollution – over USD 3 billion.

China will invest 26.6 billion yuan (US$3.28 billion; EUR2.69 billion) over the next five years to clean up the Songhua River, a key source of drinking water for tens of millions of people that was polluted in November by a toxic spill that reached into Russia, reports said Sunday.

That amount doesn’t even reflect full cost accounting. Imagine what the figure would look like with full cost accounting. Already, a third spill is in progress.

BEIJING (AFP) – A third major toxic spill in China in as many months has threatened water supplies to millions of residents of two central cities, officials and state media have said.

A clean-up accident allowed industrial chemical cadmium, which can cause neurological disorders and cancer, to flood out of a smelting works and into the Xiangjiang River in Hunan province on January 4, Xinhua news agency said Sunday.

If things go as they are going at the moment, the PRC might just overtake the US as an environmental devil.

pp/s – and Michigan goes unranked for the second time in six months. Bravo Carr!

Categories
Economics Environment

[698] Of top ten Malaysian environmental issues of 2005

With 2005 scurrying away fast, let’s see what I consider as top ten green issues in Malaysia for 2005.

Topping my list is definitely the haze that covered Malaysia, no thanks to weak Indonesian enforcement and possibly, irresponsible Malaysian firms. With Malaysians breathing smog, the term “fog you” started to gain currency. This was a signal of a growing discontent, directed towards Indonesian ineffectiveness in handling a grave major regional environmental emergency. There was even a small protest in front of the Indonesian embassy in Kuala Lumpur, and I was there. Though the problem is no more, despite a decade of this annual haze, I’ve yet to see any concrete action taken to completely solve the problem. So far, people in ASEAN have been treating the symptoms but not the cause. Hence, mark my word – the haze will return in 2006. So, stock up those masks now.

Second to the haze is the mis-development of Bukit Cahaya Seri Alam Agriculture Park in Selangor. The park is a nature reserve – what’s left of it anyway. Part of it was illegally developed by certain people and was approved by the local government in spite of the park’s status. And this happened under the nose of the state Chief Minister. Believe it or not, the Chief Minister’s office is not too far from the park. I’m very much dissatisfied with the outcome of the “investigation” since the people in the state government got away relatively unscathed. Those people should’ve been sacked and brought to justice – including the Chief Minister. But no. They even have the audacity to declare Selangor as a developed state…

Third is poarching and illegal trade of endangered wildlife. Remember the Malayan tiger that was butchered? How about the tiger cub that was saved from the soup bowl? That might be a tip of an iceberg but thanks to public exposure, awareness is starting to creep up. Slower than I would like but up nonetheless. Still, the government is not doing enough. Malaysia wildlife law needs serious upgrading. Or at least better enforcement.

Fourth is water shortage. It was rather surpising to see dams water level dangerously fell how it had fallen this year. The odd thing is, Malaysia is a tropical country and it suffers from water shortage. It’s like, going to the north pole and having a shortage of snow! Well, not really but, you know. Water rationing was imposed at several places. Thank goodness Kuala Lumpur was spared. One thing history tells us is that we never learn. This shortage is set to happen again next year and I’m convinced of that.

Fifth is still about water. This time, it’s about too much water. Northern Malaysian states suffered their worst flood in 30 years. The flood was partly due to above average torrential rain and inadequate drainage system. Crazy. Malaysians could have used that extra rain earlier but no, someone up there had a different idea. Meanwhile, Vietnam, mainland China and Japan suffered record breaking rain and snowfall. Possibility of a repeat? It depends on the climate.

Sixth, the Johor Department of the Environment fire. The fire did one thing – documents on a toxic waste case are in form of unreadable ashes now. The fire brings in suspicious circumstances given that the DOE was closing in on a toxic waste dumping case. Soon after, police comfirmed that it was an arsonist’s work. Later, a DOE officer was murdered. He was the one that reported the fire and a few other things to the police.

Seventh, mistreatment of pets. But thanks to wide coverage by Malaysian press and in part to SPCA’s efforts, Animal Ordinance 1953 is undergoing study and might have sharper teeth soon.

Number eight, bird flu. Malaysia wasn’t hit hard but culling of chickens did occur in Kelantan, near the Thai border. If Malaysia had been hit harder, eight would have been too low a rank.

Ninth. Tsunami. The 2004 tsunami convinced authorities in Malaysia and indeed all around the world of the importance of mangrove swamps. Efforts to conserve and rehabilitate mangrove swamps are receiving much needed attention due to how the swamps softened the destructive force of the tsunami.

Finally, protection of green lungs in and around Kuala Lumpur. These green areas faced possible extinction but protests from local residents prevented that. Better still, the opposition comprises of influential and filthy rich people. Thus, any effort to violate the green areas in the future will meet above average, fierce opposition.

With that, happy new year to you. I’m off to witness some fireworks.

Categories
Economics Environment Politics & government Science & technology

[691] Of worst floods, rice and climate change

Northern Malaysian states on the Malay Peninsula are suffering the worst flood in 30 years . It has been raining like crazy. Even in Kuala Lumpur, located hundreds of miles south, it’s been raining like cats and dogs. I’m surprised that the city hasn’t experience any flood.

The sky is starting to remind me of Ann Arbor; I could hardly see the sun everyday. Southern Thailand isn’t spared too. If borders are drawn with a huge pen, the floodwater would’ve erased them with ease. After all this, the weather still won’t relent.

The Weather Channel. Fair Use.

As you can see, it won’t end soon. Also, check out a current tropical storm that will hit Vietnam anytime soon today.The floodwater, among other things, affects rice harvest in Malaysia. Paddy fields are devastated by the overflowing water. This is especially bad considering that northeast Malaysian states are the main rice producers in Malaysia and that the fields are scheduled for harvest in this coming January. Looks like the rice industry will have to import more rice soon. I doubt local fields will be able to provide the share it usually offers to the market.

Worse, it isn’t just Malaysia that will suffer shortage of rice. Vietnam, which is one of the largest rice producers in Southeast Asia, suffers the same situation. Prices of rice in Southeast Asian markets should go up in the near future given that supply has been cut.

Digressing, price of chicken has gone up by 20 sen. Earlier, I had predicted a price decrease due to bird flu. Unfortunately, while playing around with the demand curve, I’d overlooked the supply function. The hike in chicken prices, ignoring inflation, could be due to the culling of chickens in Asia. With this flood, price could go up further, assuming demand curve is constant.

Though heavy raining this time of the year is typical in this part of the world, this year, the amount of rainfall is above average. Consider also the current situation in China and Japan – record breaking snowfall – and Vietnam – also record breaking rainfall. Finally, keep in mind that 2005 is, according to World Meteorological Organization, the second hottest year on reliable record.

Climate change? Too soon to ascertain but it’s good to keep the possibility in mind.

p/s – Kristof versus O’Reilly. Fight! This is the best yet since Bush versus Kerry.

Categories
Environment Politics & government

[673] Of COP 11 of UNFCCC

The Kyoto Protocol will expire in 2012 and there is a need to continue to fight climate change even after 2012. The current Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) – yeah, it’s that mouthful – plans to sustain the fight into post-Kyoto period. That plan has been dubbed as son of Kyoto.

Unfortunately, like the upcoming World Trade Organization ministerial meeting in Hong Kong, this climate change meeting is expected to fail unless a compromise is achieved. The main problem is, as it has always been for the past few years, the United States refusal to commit itself into any treaty that will put a cap on its greenhouse gases emission.

Some has insisted the parties to carry on without the US participation. That might be the most viable solution at the moment. Others on the other hand are calling for a more lenient targets to persuade to US to join in.

I definitely believe that in order to combat climate change effectively, all major emitters need to join in. That includes the US. China is the distant second largest greenhouse emitter. Tony Blair with confidence that I admire goes further by statingthere will be a binding international agreement to succeed Kyoto when the Protocol expires in 2012 that will include all major economies.”

I don’t share his optimism. In my opinion, the only way that is possible is to see a US president that will agree to Kyoto’s underlying principles. A person like John McCain or Hillary Clinton. I truly hope John McCain will make it to the White House in 2008.

Given the gloom prospect of failure, I’d be happy even with the most modest success coming out from the COP. It’d be a tragery to see a COP 10 in Buenos Aires to repeat itself in Montreal.

In the meantime, it seems that China is enjoying the moral high ground. Sometime earlier, China urged the US to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. This urging is important because it may signal that China is willing to commit itself seriously to a post-Kyoto treaty to cap its emissions. That itself is hope.

p/s – happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday to the __earthinc, happy birthday to you.

Yup. Four years of the __earthinc and still wanting to marry a tree.

Categories
Environment Poetry

[671] Of father, is a rhinoceros a dinosaur?

Fireflies live in our lore,
so do our turtles since they are no more,
turtles fled and stole our corals,
and hail now for rhinos in murals.

End of Johor rhinos? No sign of animal in national park
Sim Bak Heng

JOHOR BARU, Sun.

Where have the Sumatran rhinoceros in Johor gone? The five animals recorded in the Endau-Rompin National Park 10 years ago are believed to have become victims of poachers…

…A United Nations Development Programme/Global Environment Facility study in the late 1990s was abandoned after some time because they were unable to detect the animals.

p/s – thecicak.com has a new look. Do check them out.