Categories
Environment

[1113] Of intellectual dishonesty, palm oil and biodiversity

I know bullshit when I see one. Dr Yusof Basiron, CEO of Malaysian Palm Oil Council wrote in the NST earlier:

Malaysia utilises 90 per cent of its agricultural land for rubber and oil palm, which are essentially planted forests yielding timber and fibre in addition to rubber and oil as co-products. They contribute significantly to biodiversity as both rubber and oil palm behave as forests. In industrial countries, biodiversity on agricultural land is rarely mentioned. [The palm-oil advantage in biofuel, NST, Feb 24 2007]

Though the article has many valid points, especially on carbon neutrality of palm oil, it asserts that rubber and palm oil plantation contribute to biodiversity is downright absurd.

Consider for instance the biodiversity of a kilometer square of untouched Borneoan rainforest versus a kilometer square of palm oil or rubber plantation. Between the two, which would have more species of flora and fauna per kilometer square?

Any basic sampling will prove the former is richer in term of biodiversity. Therefore, how does converting rainforest into monocultural plantation plots contribute to biodiversity?

Surely, conversion reduces biodiversity.

In my opinion, if the article needs to be effective in convincing concerned individuals and groups that such plantation is sustainable, the article needs to prove that rubber and palm oil plantation-related deforestation does not occur. Alleging monocultural plantations lead to greater biodiversity does not help convince people like me that deforestation related to plantation activities does not occur. It sounds as if the article is defending such conversion!

In fact, such absurd assertion regarding biodiversity amounts to intellectual dishonesty at best, a lie at worst.

Categories
Economics Environment Politics & government

[1112] Of all hail to Environmental Defense

When KKR, a coal power plants operator and the Environmental Defense are mentioned in one article in the same paragraph, one would expect a report on vicious political skirmish. Quite to the contrary and to my surprise, the three groups are working together!

The buzz first came up a couple hours ago but it is only just now that I accepted it. I was like running into a think see-through glass door — it takes a moment to realize what is going on after a pang in the face. This might signal the greatest cooperation between the greens and the grays yet:

Early Monday, after several weeks of marathon negotiations that brought together both environmentalists and Wall Street bankers, TXU announced that its board of directors had approved the bid from Kohlberg Kravis and Texas Pacific for about $45 billion, which would be the largest buyout in history.

[…]

The deal was noteworthy not just for its size, but for the confluence of business decisions and environmental concerns that drove the ultimate transaction. Because private equity firms are unregulated and historically have valued their privacy, neither Kohlberg Kravis nor Texas Pacific were eager to become an “enemy combatant” of the environmental groups, people involved in the talks said. Reducing the coal plant initiative will also free up billions of dollars in planned spending that the firms will be able to use for other projects or to help finance the transaction. [NYT, Feb 26 2007]

I have a newly found respect for the Environmental Defense! That whole lot spams I received through email, tons of snail mail I received in my mailbox and that couple of bucks I donated to them while I was at Michigan worth every single bit!

This is the crux of the deal, as far as the environment is concerned, as stated in an email I received from Environmental Defense:

As part of the sale agreement, Environmental Defense helped negotiate an aggressive environmental platform that will, among other things:

  • Terminate plans for the construction of 8 of 11 coal-fired power plants TXU had hoped to build;
  • Stop TXU’s plans to expand coal operations in other states;
  • Endorse the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) platform, including the call for a mandatory federal cap on carbon emissions; and
  • Reduce the company’s carbon dioxide emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

Way to go!

w00t! w00t!

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — and Al Gore won the Oscar for An Inconvenient Truth!

Categories
Environment

[1107] Of the oil spill near Tanjung Piai

There is an oil spill near Tanjung Piai, Johor caused by a collision between a container vessel and an oil tanker last Saturday, February 17. I am not sure how bad it is but the authority states that situation is under control and that the two vessels seem to have suffer only minor damage. Despite the comfort the authority is giving to concerned individuals, the spill is expected to be cleared eight days after the accident:

JOHOR BARU: The oil spill off Tanjung Piai will be cleared by this weekend.

The sea stretch was hit by an oil spill when an oil tanker collided into a container vessel there last Saturday.

The Marine Department, Department of Environment and two oil spill response contractors are using booms and dispersants to contain, break up and collect the 50 tonnes of medium fuel oil that spilled from the container ship. [NST, Feb 22 2007]

In a Bernama report earlier, the cleaning team had expected to finish up the work sooner:

Southern Region Marine Department Director Hazman Hussein, when contacted, said only two oil spots were still visible about two nautical miles from Tanjung Piai and efforts had been taken to clean them. [Bernama, Feb 19 2007]

I wonder how long the clean up activity would take if it had been a larger spill.

I am not being critical of the clean up team but I do think given that Malaysia controls one of the world’s busiest waterways, the threat of major oil spills is real. Thus, we need to have a quick-response clean up team that could do the job fast.

Categories
Activism Environment

[1104] Of where is the Nisshin Maru?

Despite being crippled in the Southern Ocean and amid the possibility of an environmental disaster in Antarctica, the Japanese whaling factory ship Nisshin Maru is still refusing Esperanza’s aid offer. Ocean Defenders has an animation regarding the current situation.

If you feel the Japanese should accept the aid offer, please write an email to the Japanese Environment Minister, Masatoshi Wakabayashi. I know it is not much but at least, it is something.

Categories
Environment

[1095] Of little battles in the Southern Ocean

In the Southern Ocean where the whales swim, amid tussle between Japanese whalers and conservationists, the Japanese whaling factory ship Nisshin Maru is on fire:

Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) — A sailor is missing after a fire broke out on board a Japanese whaling vessel sailing off the coast of Antarctica, New Zealand’s maritime authority said.

Most of the crew of the Nisshin Maru was evacuated to other vessels in the Japanese government-run fleet and about 20 sailors remaining on board brought the fire under control, said Steve Corbett, a spokesman for Maritime New Zealand.

With a crew missing and the ship incapacitated by fire in the rough open sea, the Japanese has called for helped. The Greenpeace’s Esperanza is responding to the distress signal and this is the third distress call it responded to in six days.

Earlier, there were clashes between the Japanese whaling fleet and Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. Sea Shepherd has been the most aggressive conservationist group so far as far as this whaling season is concerned. Its ship, the Robert Hunter and Japanese whaling Kaiko Maru, which was hunting whales in the Southern Ocean whale sanctuary, collided:

Anti-whaling activists say one of their vessels and a Japanese whaling ship have collided near the Ross Sea, sparking a distress call from the Japanese crew.

Each side is blaming the other for the collision:

The two sides blamed each other for the clash near Antarctica late on Monday which holed a Sea Shepherd Conservation Society ship, the Robert Hunter.

According to The Age:

In nearly 20 years of protest against Japanese whalers, there have been other clashes on the water. But never has such a determined attempt been made to disable the fleet.

The small US-based Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and its 60-odd black-clad activists upped the ante this week to the point that Greenpeace, the whalers’ usual foe, now risks being seen as ineffectual.

There is a decade-old moratorium on whale hunting in the area but the international ban is being practically ignored by Japan. Also this week, Japan unsuccessfully organized a forum aimed to undo the moratorium:

Only 35 of the IWC’s 72 members took part in the meeting, with 26 anti-whaling countries, including the US, Britain and Australia, deciding to stay away. Their boycott drew an angry reaction from the pro-whaling nations, which accused them of “imperialism”.

The oddest about the clashes is that, when it involves human lives, the whales and the conservationists are helping each other out. For instance, during an earlier skirmish between Sea Sheppard and Nisshin Maru when two members of the former were missing, both declared truce and directed their effort into searching for the missing persons. Call it tragic comedy in the high seas but:

Two missing Sea Shepherd activists have been found safe in the Antarctic, and hostilities have resumed against the Japanese whaling fleet.

Sea Shepherd ships have since gone back to port for refuelling.

Of all distress signals, the third latest is probably the most serious. Not only there is fire on board Nisshin Maru, the ship stranded and a sailor missing, it is possible that the ship might be drifting to the world’s biggest Adelie penguin colony at Cape Adare, Antarctica, causing environmental damage through oil leakage. Greenpeace’s Esperanza is ready to aid the stranded ship and tow it to port. The Japanese however disagrees with theat assessment:

“There’s no threat of oil leakage at all, and no worries over environmental pollution from the Nisshin Maru,” said Kenji Masuda, of the Fisheries Agency.

And refusing Greenpeace’s offer:

A spokesman for the Tokyo-based Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR), which is carrying out the whaling, said other ships in the fleet could tow it from the area if required.

According to Defending Our Ocean, Esperanza has reached Nisshin Maru. There are several other ships nearby, including the US Coast Guard ship Polar Sea.

My take?

The whalers should just take up the offer and cut the season short.

In any case, Greenpeace’s conservation mission has turned into a rescue mission.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — the body of the missing person has been recovered.