Categories
Liberty Society

[951] Of Islamic law for southern Thailand and Singaporean killing fest

Thai Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont suggested the introduction of Islamic law in the troubled south:

BANGKOK, Nov. 7 (Reuters) — Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont, in another significant gesture to Muslim insurgents in the far south, said Tuesday that Islamic law should be given a bigger role there.

He also said the only condition his post-coup government would impose for talks with the insurgents was that there should be no discussion of separation.

Mr. Surayud told the Foreign Correspondents Club of Thailand that Shariah, or Islamic law, should be allowed in the area, where 80 percent of the people are ethnic Malay and Muslim.

Does the insurgency in southern Thailand revolve around Malay separatism/nationalism or the demand for Islamic law?

It might well be both but in my opinion, granting autonomy power to the Malay Thai states would be a better solution to a top down introduction of Islamic law by Bangkok.

In Singapore:

[…] they do not respond to government campaigns and directives. So they have to be shot.

“I myself have killed, I would say, about 40,000 of them,” Mr. Lim said, working in spare time from his job as a Web site editor.

Alright. Alright. I quoted it out of context. It really was about crows culling. Still, it isn’t too different to Singaporean politics, is it?

Not to mention the barbaric act of killing itself…

Categories
Politics & government Society

[948] Of defining Bangsa Malaysia

What is Bangsa Malaysia exactly?

Is it an assimilation policy to create an united race?

Is it a multicultural policy that celebrates cultural diversity?

Is it simply about the citizenship of Malaysia?

Is it about equality?

Is it about Malay rights?

Is it something else altogether?

Is it about nothing at all?

Somebody. Help me. Please.

A lot of people are giving me contradictory answers and I’m officially confused. For instance, Dr. Rais Yatim said:

IDENTIFYING oneself as Bangsa Malaysia does not mean that one forgets one’s race, culture, heritage and other practices, said Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim.

“Each of us is a Malay, Chinese, Indian or other race first, but at the same time, we belong to Bangsa Malaysia. This is because we share a common destiny, common interest socially, politically and economically,” said the minister for Culture, Arts and Heritage.

But Dr. Mahathir said:

In August, Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad made a plea for “Bangsa Malaysia” – a united Malaysian Nation in which being a Malaysian is the thing, not being Malay, Chinese, Indian, Iban or Kadazan. It means “people being able to identify themselves with the country, speak Bahasa Malaysia and accept the Constitution,” said Mahathir.

Then, Najib Razak said:

JOHOR BARU: The Bangsa Malaysia concept is the state of an individual’s mind and does not infringe on Malay special rights and privileges, said Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

The Deputy Prime Minister said Bangsa Malaysia was a concept and had nothing to do with the Constitution or national policies, but was related to an individual’s state of mind.

“Bangsa Malaysia means we do not evaluate someone by his skin colour, race or religion,” Najib said when closing the Johor Umno Convention at Persada Johor here yesterday.

“It does not question the special rights of the Malays, our quota or anything of that sort.”

Before we start banging on each other head, let’s define the term first, shall we?

I hate shooting bullets at somebody while not knowing why am I shooting the bullets in the first place.

Categories
Personal Society

[942] Of McDonald’s is no fast food

What does fast mean to you? What does fast food mean to you?

Wikipedia defines fast food as the following:

A fast-food restaurant is a restaurant characterized both by food which is supplied quickly after ordering, and by minimal service. One trait shared by all fast food establishments is the customer pays for the food prior to consuming it.

The service offered by McDonald’s in Malaysia doesn’t fall under that definition.

Though I do from time to time crave for fries, quarter pounders, hot chicken wings, etc. — I’m craving for Wendy’s right now — I try to reduce my consumption of fast food as much as possible. It’s an environmental reason, despite the fact that McDonald’s has improved its environmental practices over the years.

Being the person that I am, being able to resist everything except temptation, I consume fast food from time to time. So far, among the times I had consumed fast food in Malaysia, McDonald’s dominates the statistics. Whether it’s systematic or accidental, for most McDonald’s restaurants I’ve been to, all of them fail to offer quick service, thus making the term “fast food” irrelevant to McDonald’s. I suspect the same is true for all fast food chains in Malaysia. For the longest time, I usually cut McDonald’s some slack but not last Tuesday.

Do you remember once when McDonald’s ran a promotion, which said they’d return your money and give you free fries or something like that if they failed to serve you less than a specified time length, in Malaysia?

I have a strong suspicion that promotion didn’t go well and was allowed to die out silently because McDonald’s had to refund too much cash back to its customers that in the end, hurting its bottom line.

Last Tuesday was one of the days which I suddenly experienced a strong urge for a Big Mac. On top of that, I was hungry, I had already wasted too much of my lunchtime at a local bank, depositing some cash into an account of a local environmental advocacy group. So, I needed something to go and close by was the golden arch with Ronald seemingly calling me out in his ugly custom. So, I marched mindlessly toward the arch as a considerable pace, hailing globalization for allowing such scenario was at all possible.

The lines weren’t too bad. There were probably eight manned counters with three people lining up at a counter on average. Unlike at the trains, nobody was jumping any line here. Thanks heaven for that. I probably spent between five to ten minutes waiting for my turn. When it was my turn to contribute to the Malaysian gross domestic product, I ordered what I wanted in the most efficient manner that I could think of at the moment: “Big Mac meal, regular size, to go”. One would assume the server or cashier or whoever behind the counter was to oblige, right?

Well, assumption is the mother of you-know-what. People in the Battlestar Galactica world would call it frack up. Don’t you love neologism?

It was all happy and smile when the person behind the counter took the order, presumingly left the counter unmanned to gather my Big Mac and fries into a paper bag. A minute later, I was checking my watch, wondering how much time I had left for lunch. A minute later, I was glad to find out that my watch was still running. Another minute later, I became annoyed that my watch was ticking at an audacious rate. Yet another minute later, the annoyance started to get the best of me. And then another minute. And then another and another and another…

Yes, I’m exaggerating but the agony of waiting cannot be understated. I’m not fracking kidding you.

When the counter was finally remanned, this time by another person, the person signaled to me that she was ready to accept payment. I which was already visibly annoyed refused to pay and asked, “But what about my meal?”

She was unable to answer the question and the situation was getting a bit uncomfortable for both of us. Well, just for McDonald’s, really. The original person that served me came to her rescue and informed me that my Big Mac was on its way and I had to wait for a few minutes longer.

If I could buy time, I would but I can’t. I refused to wait, said no thank you to both of them and left the premise, hoping that my action left bad impression on McDonald’s service among the other customers that witnessed the event.

I was growling unfortunately and time was running out. So, I opted for chocolate cookies for lunch while vowing that I will not pay for McDonald’s for a very long time, unless things markedly improve.

Categories
Science & technology Society

[940] Of morality is genetic?

From the NYT:

Who doesn’t know the difference between right and wrong? Yet that essential knowledge, generally assumed to come from parental teaching or religious or legal instruction, could turn out to have a quite different origin.

Primatologists like Frans de Waal have long argued that the roots of human morality are evident in social animals like apes and monkeys. The animals’ feelings of empathy and expectations of reciprocity are essential behaviors for mammalian group living and can be regarded as a counterpart of human morality.

Marc D. Hauser, a Harvard biologist, has built on this idea to propose that people are born with a moral grammar wired into their neural circuits by evolution. In a new book, “Moral Minds” (HarperCollins 2006), he argues that the grammar generates instant moral judgments which, in part because of the quick decisions that must be made in life-or-death situations, are inaccessible to the conscious mind.

Also, a statement related to my assertion that morality is independent of religion:

Both atheists and people belonging to a wide range of faiths make the same moral judgments, Dr. Hauser writes, implying “that the system that unconsciously generates moral judgments is immune to religious doctrine.” Dr. Hauser argues that the moral grammar operates in much the same way as the universal grammar proposed by the linguist Noam Chomsky as the innate neural machinery for language. The universal grammar is a system of rules for generating syntax and vocabulary but does not specify any particular language. That is supplied by the culture in which a child grows up.

If morality is genetic, our understanding of morality — and of ourselves — will be greatly challenged.

Categories
Economics Society

[932] Of Malaysia, truly Asia

Might be a year late but I can’t get the Malaysia truly Asia song out of my mind. So, I’m immortalizing it here:

Everything I’ve wanted, all that I’ve asked of you.
Everything I’ve dreamed of, it’s all coming true.
So stay with me (with me), as we walk hand in hand.

Malaysia, truly Asia,
The mountains and the sea.
Malaysia, truly Asia,
It’s calling out, to you and me.
Malaysia, truly Asia.

Whoever that came up with that tagline, the song and the ad is a genius. Too bad, I’ve never seen it on the TV in the United States and only saw it when I came back to Malaysia.

What I think is this: the ad should be shown abroad, not in Malaysia.

What I further think is this: But things like the moral police won’t help by one bit. No song will undo the damage done by the moral police. Already, it’s hurting the economy and effort to build a more diverse and rich Malaysian society:

LANGKAWI: Retired American policeman Randal Barnhart, who was subjected to a 2am raid by religious enforcement officers, is reconsidering his plan to make Malaysia his second home.

“After that unpleasant episode two weeks ago, I do not feel like making Malaysia my second home. It is a pity because both my wife and I really love Langkawi,” he said.

I say it again. We need to disband the moral police.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — Okay. Apparently this particular entry get lots of hit and I figure people are probably looking for the actual song. So, enjoy.

[youtube]nSqI9_pmqOc[/youtube]