Categories
Society

[2057] Of a generation of activist idealists

A trauma can make or break a person. It can make or break a generation too.

In an inconspicuous house in Bangsar, a group of individuals belonging to the generation that I identify myself with has been meeting consistently for the past few weeks. There is only one agenda in their list and it revolves around a very global issue of climate change. They endeavor to spread awareness of it among Malaysian youth. More ambitiously, they seek to influence national policy on climate change.

The idea for doing so began modestly and very much fueled by conviction to a cause. Friends and strangers met and discovered that they share a passion. With that passion, they banded together to act. They started making calls and sending emails looking for support among larger circles of friends to garner resources required to get the ball rolling.

Climate change was an issue close to my heart. A number of factors prodded me into the realm of economics and climate change, out of several, was one of them. It was back in the late 1990s when I was still a teenager that I found myself attracted to a concept where a person could trade carbon as currency. With no training in economics whatsoever at that time, it was easy for me to be amazed at it.

The concept — pricing carbon to combat negative externality — and many more ideas surrounding the issue are not alien to me any longer. Just as understanding of physical sciences inevitably render what conceived as magic and supernatural events by the unenlightened into dull phenomena, so too does command of economics wash away my awe.

Ironic as it may seem, economics has made me less enthusiastic with the subject. The tools of economics have made me realize how hard it is to solve the issue. Meanwhile, the politics of climate change simply makes it impossible. Just weeks earlier, Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd admitted that the odds of success at the much-anticipated climate change meet-up in Copenhagen, Denmark are bleak and rightly so.

Yet, there they are in Bangsar, speaking so passionately about the issue, trying to affect and effect it. A row of ants standing in the path of an elephant, as I first saw it.

I am tempted to be skeptical about they can achieve, especially given the reality of climate change politics.

Each time I want to express my skepticism however, my mind races back in time to the day of my graduation. Amid melancholic mood, uncertain of what the world holds for me, the President of my alma mater, Mrs. Coleman, inspired me. She said, ””¦stand up for what you believe in, and what is right. You just might change course of events for the better.”

This is a hallmark of an idealist.

A friend of mine jokingly called the group in Bangsar as the Planeteers; remember the cartoon?

Jokes asides, these Planeteers are but an example of idealists that make-up this generation of below 30s.

Another group of friends is working hard to share educational opportunities that exist in the United States with students in Malaysia. They are out that to smash the myth that gaining admission into the best schools is either impossible or expensive or both. They are already in those schools and they are inspiring others to be ambitious, just as they had. Together, they hold an ideal that Malaysians should have access to not just basic education but fulfilling education that many in my circles strongly believe that the Malaysian system is simply unable to provide, for various reasons.

Yet another set of brilliant cohorts with sterling education joined politics in drove as interns and assistants to politicians whose ideals they share. And they too, signed up of conviction, not out of power. There is a dangerous of generalization here for surely, in every generation, they are dishonest individuals out mere to acquire power. That seem irrelevant to my circles of friends. In their eyes, I see a cause.

This surprises me greatly. For a generation condemned by others as highly disinterested in politics and societal issues at large, and only out and about listening to unbearable noise on their iPod and out large at night in roaming the city, the manner at which they have come in to shape politics is one big finger to such condescending generalization.

A common criticism directed against idealists is that they are still young and naïve. The real world, sooner or later, will break them. This generation of mine, or at least my circles, in a trend so overwhelming like a 50-meter tall wave to a sampan, is different. They are a different kind of idealists where that criticism is a knife to a hard stone.

These idealists recognize harsh reality. Contrary to typical characterization of an idealist, these idealists found their ideals out of disappointment and out of that disappointment, a call to activism.
They have been all over the world. They witnessed it, made judgment about it, made comparison out of it. And they are disillusioned with Malaysia.

They were angry at everything that is true. All promises were broken and they are posed to inherit a broken country with disrepute institutions, diminished national pride and worsening race relations. While the older generations tend to dismiss this generation as unappreciative of past sacrifices, this new breed of idealist activists see that the older generations have failed them.

What else can so comprehensively explain why the nation’s youth, in an unambiguous manner, voted against the establishment in 2008?

The disillusionment is traumatic, but it has hardened, not broken, them.

Rather than consoling themselves, they decide to not tweak their ideals, but almost outrageously go out to tweak reality. They endeavor to close the gap between ideals and reality, to improve the lamentable state that we Malaysians are in.

Perhaps, these circles of mine sit in the outlier and overly privileged in their upbringing. After all, not too many attended the likes of Harvard, Dartmouth, Colby, Berkeley — and, ahem, Michigan — among others.
But experience tells me that outliers exude contagious confidence. The arithmetic mean is susceptible to outliers.

Such confidence is bound for greatness. It is individual confidence that no longer dependent on the State or the community. They are, by themselves, individually, a whole army.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

First published in The Malaysian Insider on August 11 2009.

Categories
Society

[2043] Of Zaid Ibrahim’s Malay is amusingly quaint

The Malay language has undergone multiple changes throughout its life. As the language evolves, it enhances intergenerational difference. Different generation would subscribe to their version of the language, if they do not particularly follow development in the language closely.

Zaid Ibrahim is an example of a person who still uses an outdated spelling of Malay. In this latest posting entitled Orang Kelantan Mudah Di Pujok?:

Keputusan pilihanraya Manik Urai menunjokan bahawa tidak semua pengundi membuat pilihan berdasarkan isu yang penting dan mustahak. Semasa berkempen disana saya memberi tumpuan pada hal royalti minyak Saya ingat inilah isu yang sepatut nya diketahui rakyat Kelantan. Tapi malang nya keputusan tidak sebagitu. Inilah yang mengecewakan. Pada saya isu Kerajaan Pusat menafikan hak royalti minyak kapada Kelantan sepatut nya menjadi isu yang menyatukan hati orang Kelantan.Sepatut nya BN di hukum olih rakyat Kelantan kerana tidak memberitahu mereka perkara yang benar. BN patut dihukum kerana BN berdiam diri dan sengaja tidak mahu rakyat Kelantan mendapat hak mereka sebanyak RM 1 billion. Agak nya BN sanggup berbuat demikian kerana mereka tahu memadailah kapada orang Manik Urai kalau jambatan 7 juta ringgit dijanjikan atau wang 1000 Ringgit diberi kapada pengundi pengundi terpilih. [Orang Kelantan Mudah Di Pujok? Zaid Ibrahim. July 26 2009]

When I was younger as I took my instruction in Malay, ‘menunjokan‘ (to show) was spelled menunjukan’ ‘menunjukkan’ and ‘pujok‘ (placate) was spelled ‘pujuk’. I am confident that the latest authorative Malay dictionary will prove that my version of Malay spelling remains the most current one.

The ‘o’ does not seem to be a mistake on Zaid Ibrahim’s part because he consistently places ‘o’ where ‘u’ should have taken its rightful place in the latest spelling method.

On Twitter, he spells ‘suruhanjaya’ as ‘surohanjaya’.

Satu Lagi Surohanjaya?: Kata Dr Mahathir orang Melayu mudah lupa; saya pula kata orang Malaysia juga mudah lupa… [myzaidibrahim. Zaid Ibrahim. July 23 2009]

I do not particular know when this kind of spelling was last used but I would risk guessing the 1970s.

I am sure some of my 1990s Malay has been rendered outdated by linguists who seem to have no other work but to torture the users of the language. For instance, I would spell ‘baharu’ as ‘baru’.

Why the change happened is beyond me. What certain is that baharu is not as economical as baru.

Perhaps, I am just old. But not as old as Zaid Ibrahim.

Categories
Pop culture Society

[2042] Of she left us too soon

I woke up to terrible news today. Yasmin Ahmad, a celebrated personality in the local visual media scene, walks no more on this fair earth.

I have only met and conversed with her only once. It was at Hishammudin Rais’ little restaurant at the Central Market Annexe in Kuala Lumpur.

There was a forum at the Bar Council earlier and she was one of the speakers. I do not particularly recall what was discussed. I do however remember that a friend came up to the microphone and offered his definition of Malay, but that was more of a sidetrack than of a central theme. And I do remember a bunch of people congregated around her as I sat watching from the back of the room.

They were all excited about talking to her. The reason for that was obvious. She was Yasmin Ahmad, after all. To many I would imagine, they would not have watched a Malay film, no, a Malaysian film, for a very long time, if it was not for her.

At some point, everybody — for about ten persons — decided that a late supper was a great idea. Again, pardon me, but I do not remember how I was invited to the supper. Furthermore, I do not remember who was at the table, aside from that friend of mine, Yasmin Ahmad and Brian Yap. It was here that Brian and I were formally introduced to each other. I am sure I met other new friends there too but for the life of me, this was a good two or three years ago. My memory rots as a fallen tree branch would in the middle of rainforest.

What I remember best was the excitement about speaking to Yasmin personally. I think highly of her because, I truly believed that she was the best thing to have happened to Malaysian film scene since the days of P. Ramlee.

I first got to familiarize with her name after Sepet. I loved it. I loved it for the message it tried to deliver to the masses. I loved it for the controversy it stirred. And of course, every guy loved Sharifah Amani. Every guy has to thank Yasminfor introducing Sharifah Amani to the wider populace.

Sepet came out when I was still abroad. Prior to Sepet, I had no respect at all, anymore, for Malaysian film industry. In the Malaysian circle I was in then, the opinion that I held more or less shared by everybody else. When these friends, Malaysians abroad, started to get excited about the film, I naturally became curious.

My curiosity was not enough to bring me to watch it then because, hey, I was abroad and when it comes to movies, instant gratification does not exist in my vocabulary. And so, Sepet went to the back of my mind until I finally returned to Malaysia, at a time when everything seemed so lost.

Everybody was a racist, it seemed, and the country appeared beyond redemption. Amid all that, I remembered Sepet. It was Eid and the television was airing Sepet. I watched it and thought, at least, a flash of hope that things could get better. Here was what I considered a flicker of rebellion to the suffocating prevailing racial and communal culture in Malaysia.

Her work caused hostile responses for the conservative side of Malaysian society. It sparked a kind of debate sorely needed for our society to progress toward a more inclusive environment. The good thing about the debate was that conservative responses were so outrageous that I would like to think that it helped make the results of March 8 2008 — the general election that brought upon the biggest middle finger to the establishment in Malaysian history — a reality. It contributed in a little way and indirectly but it contributed regardless.

Her biggest impact was probably to the advertising industry. I said so because, thanks to her, everybody looked forward to Petronas’ advertisements. Malaysian audience anticipated her works as much as how US audience eagerly awaits the ads during the Superbowl. It has become a culture where it happens year in and year out. Unlike her films, the ads were sustaining an expectation, a way of life for Malaysians.

Yet, honestly, the ads are clichés, especially the ones that associate itself with Eid, Chinese New Year and other communal celebrations.

The biggest cliché of all, to me at least, was that Petronas ads about a Chinese boy and a Malay girl sharing infatuation with each other. It is a cliché, at least to the culturally liberal. Clichéd as it may be, people actually liked it. Somehow, she transformed a cliché into a classic. It is a classic because she put the cliché idea into a media that everybody can understand.

Previously, the idea of inclusiveness was mainly confined to words but words do not have the power of visual arts. In the old days of European Renaissance, the enlightened, full cognizant that the masses were illiterate, turned to paintings to tell stories. Yasmin did that for the idea of inclusiveness, the idea of Bangsa Malaysia.

There was more to do to further popularize the idea of inclusiveness, for the creation of a liberal society. Unfortunately, as fate has it, she left us too soon.

Categories
Personal Society

[2039] Of ghost unseen in a cold Sydney

While I am excited to see the constellations above my head change yet again, I had some consternation about living in Australia for an extended period. Weeks prior to actually first setting my feet Down Under and even days after my arrival, allegations of Australian racism and xenophobia constantly kept my enthusiasm in check.

I would like to think that my reaction is only natural after Indian students not too long ago alleged that they were victims of racism in Australia. Who would not feel so especially if one is unfamiliar with Australian society?

For those who kept abreast with news aboard, they would surely be aware that Indian students in Australia several weeks ago organised several protests — with the largest in Sydney — to highlight what they felt as racially motivated attacks against the Indian community. It was so well highlighted that the whole issue amounted to a minor diplomatic row between Australia and India. It was big enough a brouhaha that the prime ministers of both countries contacted each other, with Kevin Rudd trying to assure Manmohan Singh of the safety of Indian students.

With respect to the protests, the Rudd administration said all the right things and it was a comfortable thing to here. Yet, that is mere politics and it may not necessarily reflect the reality on the ground. As a Malaysian who has lived through one of the most disappointing administrations in Malaysian history, it is easy for me to be sceptical of the words of any government; that attitude only doubles whatever scepticism against the state I have that stems from libertarian tradition.

To be fair, the issue faced by Indian students may be slightly more complex than a simple case of racism. Considerable number of Indians stayed in unsafe areas and this probably contributed to the occurrence of crime that they suffered. There is plethora of other factors too but all of it seems to be specific to the Indian community. And so, I thought, perhaps it was best that I should not be overly worried about the matter.

Yet, anecdotes from friends forced me to rethink about my concern.

During one of those late-nights meet-up with what now to me yet again feels like food served in heaven meant for the gods on our tables, a Malaysian friend of Chinese ethnicity complained how Australia is unbelievably racist. Undergoing his undergraduate studies in the United States, it was the summer holidays and he spent his time visiting his sister in Australia. While I do think he enjoyed his visit, he was clearly disturbed by what he believed was the worst racial abuse he had ever received. A six-year old Australian called him a chink.

Or as he vividly put it, ”A six-year old! Imagine that!” with arms in the air.

He went on to warn me to prepare myself. Among friends in a familiar environment, which was one of Kuala Lumpur’s popular suburbs, I could afford to laugh it off. Now that I find myself in the middle of Sydney and strangers, I am beginning to think it was not as funny as I found it first to be.

Perhaps, it is gross generalisation but a new friend of mine that I met in Sydney suggested that Australians have issues with Chinese from China in particular. He stated that the unfriendly attitude that that Chinese Malaysian friend of mine suffered in Australia was probably due to the inability of Australians to differentiate between overseas Chinese and Chinese from China. I am quite unsure why some Australians have issues with Chinese citizens but I will surely learn more about it later.

Amid that, it calls to mind a racially motivated riot in Cronulla that occurred in 2005 when I was an undergraduate student in the United States. And then, there is Pauline Hanson in the 1990s, a politician who perhaps symbolises not just racism but xenophobia at large in Australia.

All that was enough to convince me to keep my guard up the minute I stepped out of Sydney Airport.

I suppose my current path is similar to the one I took back in 2001 when I found myself adjusting to life in the US with the Sept 11 attacks in the background. Many Malaysians warned me to be careful but while the concern was legitimate, and profiling at airports did occur, time spent in the US was the happiest in my life so far. Rather than suffering xenophobic abuse, I found the US a welcoming place where I enjoyed the greatest freedom I have ever had in my life.

I am beginning to feel confident that my same experience in the US will repeat itself in Australia. I am confident because in spite of my fear of becoming a victim of racism or xenophobia in general, I am happy to state that I have not to suffer any racial abuse so far. People have generally been friendly and helpful. New friends, especially, who I have made are warm enough that I think fighting the winter in Sydney will be a walk in the park.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

First published in The Malaysian Insider on July 20 2009.

Categories
Society

[2030] Of Gender-based quota is counter-productive

We live in a world full of inequality in terms of rights and opportunities. For those who care, it is only natural for them to address it and one of the tools available to correct the inequality is affirmative action. While the tool can be useful at creating an egalitarian society, it is imperative for us to note that certain injustices do arise as a response to previous inequality or injustice. This needs to be avoided.

Two wrongs make a right: this is one of the dangers of race-based affirmative action in Malaysia. It is also one of the dangers of setting aside a 30 per cent quota for women participation at all levels of decision-making in the government. An attempt to introduce such quotas as part of gender-based affirmative action is a policy of reverse discrimination, and hence an unjust policy.

The biggest issue about setting aside quotas for any particular group is about meritocracy. Specifically, it revolves around the availability of qualified talent within that group. The question is all the more relevant in critical areas like decision-making where competency in a particular subject is a requirement in designing good public policy. For us to move forward, we need the best individuals to articulate our public policy. Any intention to take into account factors that may deprive the government from the best talent should only be considered after thorough thinking.

If the quota is set in place, and if there are not enough qualified women to fill the quota, then those who are responsible for achieving the quota will fill the designated space with token candidates. This will be a recipe for disastrous decision-making and public policy. Or at the very least, these token candidate will not be able contribute to the kind of discussions required to form good public policy and decisions.
The quota also prevents the best, regardless of gender, from taking their rightful place. This is an act of injustice to those who are more than qualified to occupy a decision-making position but are denied that position because they belong to the wrong gender.

The formulation of good policies is in the interest of all residents of Malaysia, especially citizens. It is for this reason that the 30 per cent participation quota in decision-making for women is not exclusively a women matter. We live in an interdependent world. Decision-making in the government can affect each and every one of us. This is especially so if blunt policies are preferred to precise ones since precise policies and decision-making require highly knowledgeable policymakers.

This is not to say that women are not capable. Far from it, enough women have proven their credentials to make the reverse true. Rather, these competencies are likely gender neutral. It is this neutrality that allows capable women — or simply, capable persons — to prove themselves in the free market without prejudice. Any capable person can compete fairly in a merit-based system and need not rely on special provisions, as usually provided by affirmative action, to rise through the ranks.

Institution of an affirmative action that is based on a kind of equality of outcome may open capable women to unfair generalisation. Just as successful Malays are susceptible to the accusation that they are successful mostly due to affirmative action instead of effort, the introduction of a 30 per cent quota for women participation at all levels of decision-making will do the same thing to capable women.

There are better ways to address inequality and downright discrimination that exists across gender. It involves a shift of focus from equality of outcome to equality of opportunities. By equality of opportunities, in this context, it means no discrimination based on gender. In fact, a society that embraces the concept of equality of rights that is a mere extension to the idea of individual liberty must eliminate such discrimination.

Along with equality of opportunities, what is more useful in addressing low representation of women in decision-making levels is the empowerment of women. This calls for awareness of opportunities that exist as well as, perhaps more importantly, access to education. Building capability or any other effort at organic improvement is more meaningful and more sustainable than achieving some sort of equality dictated from the top.

Once equality of opportunities and empowerment of women are truly done, then there is no reason why women participation in decision-making should be at only 30 per cent, given that women make up roughly half of the Malaysian population. The organic solutions will improve the participation rate without resorting to unjust reverse discrimination. It will also ensure those participating in various decision-making levels truly belong there, regardless of gender.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

First published in The Malaysian Insider on July 9 2009.