Categories
Economics

[1803] Of the dramatic decline of the Australian dollar against the Malaysian ringgit

Just several weeks ago, it cost approximately MYR3.00 to get AUD1.00. I know this because I needed considerable amount of Australian dollar soon and I have been watching the exchange rate between the two currencies very closely to figure out when will be the best time for me to purchase the Australian dollar in bulk.

Since then, the Australian dollar has lost over 16% of its value compared to the ringgit. As a direct result, I found whatever cost I need to bare in Australia went down by the same percentage.

The decline is spectacular because of its suddenness as well as the fact that the last time the Malaysian ringgit fared so well against the Australian dollar was over 5 years ago. For this week alone, the dollar lost 8% of its value; on the day after the rate cut was announced, at maximum, it lost 6% of its value compared to the ringgit.

This is definitely a chance for me to buy up Australian dollar cheaply.

I am unsure if I should wait since I am unsure if the Bank Negara would keep the Malaysian rate at its current level. With inflation moderating and the economy slowing down, the Bank might be tempted to reduce the rate. If the interest goes down, the ringgit would likely see some depreciation against the Australian dollar.

Also, with the impressive coordinated rate cuts across the world yesterday, the ringgit has appreciated markedly against the British pound sterling and the Euro, among economies saw a rate cut.

But for those interested in the economic implication rather than my networth, does this mean the Malaysian economy is doing good?

That is hard to say because the exchange rate is not a good measure of economic health. Especially in the case between the Australian dollar and the Malaysian ringgit, it is clear that the rate differential plays a huge part in the depreciation of the Australian dollar rather than the health of the Malaysian economy per se. Indeed, the cause of the depreciation is the confidence crisis faced by the Australian economy and less to do with improvement of confidence in the Malaysian economy on general. This causal relationship becomes more convincing when the Australian dollar is depreciating in large magnitude against its trading partners.

This is an important factor to remember the next time you heard anybody trying to pass off the strengh of the ringgit against any currency, including the US dollar, as a reflection of the Malaysian economy. The relationship between the two is not quite so simple. Before believing that person, among other things, check out what is happening in the other economy first. In other words, check the various indicators of the real economy.

Categories
Economics

[1802] Of looking at the wrong barometer

The Malaysia Deposit Insurance Corporation sure does take its job seriously. Amid news of bank runs, financial meltdowns, recession abroad and the spectre of — heaven forbid — depression in the United States, the corporation or PIDM is going all out to inform the public that their savings are insured up to a certain level. It is great that the PIDM is taking the initiative to assure savers but I wonder how justified is it for savers and the public in general to take such a negative perspective of the local economy.

I certainly do not expect a bank run to occur in Malaysia. To expect otherwise just because there are bank run in other countries seems excessively pessimistic. The reason is that the economic circumstances in countries where bank runs have occurred in the past months are different from that in Malaysia despite the fact that the world economy is more integrated than ever before.

But then again, a bank run is usually about a crisis of confidence and rarely about the soundness of a bank. With doomsayers and conspiracy theorists working overtime all over to undermine public confidence, maybe explaining to the public the benefits of savings insurance is not a bad idea after all.

Perhaps, especially so when even the latest data released by the Merdeka Centre showed that “economic issues” is among the top concerns of Malaysians. With the stock market not doing too good either, the headlines in the business section typically play an unhappy tune.

Despite the concerns, yet, looking at various economic indicators, the Malaysian real economy seems to be doing okay. It is not doing great but the sky is not falling either.

One of the few things which may be helpful in judging the state of the economy is to watch for the yield curve of Malaysian government bonds.

An inverted yield curve could signal an economic slowdown because a yield curve in a way measures the expected economic environment in the future. A rising yield curve may indicate better expected returns in the future while an inverted curve may indicate worsening expected returns in the future.

A brief check shows that the yield curve for Malaysian government bonds is healthily normal. The yield for a three-year bond is over 1 per cent lower than that of 20-year bond. Suffice to say, the future does not look too gloomy from this perspective.

Meanwhile, the consumer price index is expected to tatter the further we go into the future. At the same time, core inflation remains relatively low. The reason Bank Negara did not increase the overnight lending rate the last time it deliberated on the matter is exactly because expected inflation is expected to be low in the near future.

Granted, Bank Negara’s loose policy may increase inflation rate in the future and even the yield seems to show that inflation may rise. Still, with falling crude oil prices in part due to an economic slowdown as well as perhaps persistent adaptive responses made earlier with respect to record fuel prices, a tendency for the rate to increase will be met with a downward force.

And how many people are jobless right now?

Surely we would expect a lot of people to be out of jobs if the Malaysian economy is melting away like an ice cream in a middle of a field at noon time. Yet, the unemployment rate was just about 3.5 per cent in the second quarter of 2008. That is pretty much the same for the second quarter of 2007 as well as 2006. How similar?

Well, the unemployment rate for the second quarter of 2006 and 2007 was both 3.4 per cent. That is not exactly a disaster, if you ask me.

Furthermore, it is quite hard to see how the measure of joblessness would increase dramatically, especially when the industrial production index does not show a decrease according to the latest figures we have for this year.

The prospect of growth also does not convince me that the unemployment rate would go up after controlling for seasonal effect. The growth rate of Malaysia’s Gross Domestic Product is expected to be positive in spite of mountains of bad news from overseas. In the most liberal manner, a recession happens if two consecutive quarters see negative growth rate. Malaysia has yet to see that and probably would not see that happening anytime soon.

Malaysia will miss its target but the rate will still be positive; both the Asian Development Bank and RAM expect the country to grow by at least 5 per cent. To make it clear how the fundamentals do not align with the prevalent pessimism in the market, the GDP growth rate for the second quarter of 2008 actually is higher than that for the same period a year ago.

Despite the respectable showing of various indicators including those of the real economy, the public and even the media are accepting the stock market as the barometer of the economy. Hell, some even take whatever direction the Dow Jones would take as indicative of the future path of the Malaysian economy.

The stock markets, however, do not measure the real economy. In fact, the stock market actually lags behind economic cycles. What it means is that whenever the stock markets are down, it is probably already too late to do anything. On top of that, the stock markets take into account various information which has little to do with the real economy. And the fact is that the real economy is doing better than the stock markets.

However, I am not belittling the economic slowdown we are experiencing. For some people, it is getting harder to make a living. After all, the coincident and the lagging indices do suggest that the economy is slowing down. Indeed, the situation in the US, the largest trading partner of Malaysia, is adversely affecting the local economy. Yet, despite dire prediction, the exports sectors are doing better than expected. Truly, believe it or not, the electronics sector is actually growing. The growth is at a snail pace but growing nonetheless.

What I am trying to get at is you should take your eyes off the stock markets and watch the indicators of the real economy instead. That, and keep your chin up.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

A version of this article was published in The Malaysian Insider.

Categories
Economics

[1801] Of minimum wages as a tool to retain local talent in a free flow of labor environment

Today:

Subramaniam said while the Government did not agree on the implementation of a minimum wage for all workers, it recognised that it was necessary to offer decent salaries as the country was losing its skilled employees to its competitors.

”We are losing our skilled workers to Singapore and the Middle East. We may end up losing even more so we must come up with attractive salaries as a way of persuading them to stay on. [Council to look into salaries of electronics, textile sectors. Sim Leoi Leoi. October 7 2008]

Basically, it is an idea to use minimum wages as a tool to retain local talent.

I do not think that it is a good idea. Consider the following scenarios and questions.

If there is free flow of labor as the Minister suggests, then it is far better to let employers and employees to negotiate with each other and decide what levels of wages are the best for both. If the businesses really need the talent, then the employers will offer wages high enough to effectively match wages offered outside of the country. For brevity, let us call this kind of wages as parity wages.

If there is no or little need for the talent, then there will be no parity wages. And when there is no or little need for such talent, would imposition of minimum wages help keep talent local? How does the Minister plan to keep talent local if there is no need or little need for such talent in the first place?

As for businesses based locally but unable to offer parity wages and yet are able to find willing talent, would minimum wages, which increases the cost of factor of production for the business help increase hiring? How would imposition of minimum wages encourage job creation in the country? How would imposition of minimum wages ensure that the businesses do not close down or migrate to somewhere cheaper, and hence, worsen employment opportunites in the country?

Categories
Economics

[1799] Of the website of Department of Statistics gets a facelift

I was doing some research and needed to get some data from the Statistics Department. I was pleasantly surprised to find out that the website of the Department has seen an improvement. It is prettier than the old version and more navigable too.

Good work to whoever that worked on the website.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

p/s — I wonder when will Bank Negara do something about their website. It is really a pain navigating around their site.

Categories
Economics

[1798] Of a case against pegging the ringgit

Any policy which pays too much attention to the symptoms of an issue while ignoring its root cause only deserves outright rejection. The Malaysian government’s typical response to shortage of goods is one such policy. The shortage is unambiguously caused by a price and supply control mechanism, which prevents prices from adjusting according to prevailing supply and demand, as well as incorporating other relevant information. Yet, time and again, the authorities blame smugglers for the problem. Not that smugglers deserve any defending, but they are but a mere symptom of a control regime. Addressing a symptom is an ineffective way of solving a problem. Another policy which conflates symptoms with root cause is the pegging of the Malaysian ringgit to some currencies.

The rationale of the proposed policy is simple: It is aimed to stop the ringgit from weakening further vis-à-vis other currencies.

The root cause of a weakening ringgit is the economy itself. Although I am unable to exactly pinpoint the causes, I do have a list of suspects and three of them are political uncertainty, fiscal deficit and windfall tax.

The political uncertainty which we are experiencing so far has a lot to do with it. After all, Credit Suisse did advise investors to stay clear of Malaysia due to the political turmoil. Apart from Pakatan Rakyat’s increasingly tiring poker face with respect to their claim of entering Putrajaya, the recent use of ISA continues to send unhelpful signals to local and foreign investors. As a result, money flows out.

The fiscal deficit of the Malaysian government is yet another factor which may encourage capital outflow. Several economists, among them Salant and Krugman, did suggest that persistent deficit may cause capital flight.

This happened to the Indonesian rupiah several years ago as the size of the fuel subsidy ballooned into the Indonesian fiscal deficit. The rupiah dropped to a frightening level and it only recovered after the Indonesian government decided to dramatically cut the size of the fuel subsidy. Unrest ensued, but in the eyes of advocates of the peg, the rupiah was saved.

Another reason for the lackluster performance of the ringgit might be the imposition of the windfall tax. Earlier, the government imposed significant windfall tax on independent power producers. The imposition is no laughing matter because approximately a fifth of the local bond market is made up of papers issued by the power producers.

Such a tax naturally spooked the bond market, shooing investors away together with their money. In the typical fashion of the current administration, however, the windfall tax was scrapped and replaced with something else. While the U-turn was celebrated, the damage had already been done.

Indeed, Malaysia is not the only destination for investment. Once the money is out, there is little reason for it to come back, especially when there are far better options out there. The financial fortresses of Singapore and Hong Kong are not too far away, if distance is an issue at all in this age of light speed communication.

All of the factors need to be addressed if the strength of the ringgit is an issue. A peg, however, does little to address these issues.

A peg basically acts like a wall. Unless the push factors are addressed, pressure against the wall would build up and it would depend on the strength of the wall to prevent a terrible flood. That wall is the reserve of the central bank.

In the case of the peg, the central bank would have to maintain a position with respect to the currencies which the ringgit is pegged against. In times of a weakening ringgit, the bank would need to shore the ringgit up to the predetermined level by reducing the quantity of money circulated in the market. In effect, this would raise interest rates.

During a period of economic crisis, it is typical for a central bank to lower the interest rates by providing liquidity to promote growth in general, or at least to cushion the effect of a downturn. A peg, however, does exactly the opposite.

Borrowing will become more expensive and create an environment not conducive for greater economic activities, with all else being equal. Whereas consumption is required to fuel a flattering economy, a signal for greater savings and delayed investment is sent instead.

Increased savings will, of course, bring the interest rates back down if it gets to the necessary level, but by the time that happens, the economy would probably find itself in better health, removing the urgency for greater consumption.

Besides, a peg assumes that a particular level or band of ringgit vis-à-vis some currencies is more favorable than any other for everybody on average. Though mainstream economics has been accused of simplifying the world through its models, this assumption goes frighteningly further by committing a hasty generalization.

An economy does not comprise of homogeneous members. A strong currency is not necessarily good for everybody just as a weak currency is not necessarily good at all. Exporters for instance would love a relatively weak currency while importers would love a strong currency. It really depends on which side one is on.

The best way to balance the competing demands of various players within the economy is to allow the market to consider all variables to churn out the right answer. Within this context, Governor Zeti Akhtar Aziz rightly dismissed the call to peg the ringgit to the dollar or any other currencies.

Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Some rights reserved

A version of this article was published in The Malaysian Insider.