Categories
Economics Environment

[394] Of Bangladesh

Last Sunday, I attended a party (okay, okay it was lunch) along with a few field hockey people somewhere in the town of Ann Arbor. The food was enjoyable; we had tandoori chickens with some spiced rice and an ice cream cake. This coming Friday, there will be a party for the field hockey people again and then, another party (or lunch) on Saturday a week later. I think the field hockey club is starting on a tradition (from now on, I will refer field hockey as hockey. Ice hockey is irrelevent as much as calling football as soccer). A yum yum tradition!

The lunch started to get interesting when the conversion started. The conversion at first was about the game that we played on the previous day. It was a good game under a fantastic weather. The sun was bright, the sky was cloudless and blue, neither too hot nor too cold. It was heaven. We even had two MSU people playing with us.

Then, we talked about hockey still. It should not be a surprise that we talked a lot about hockey. It was a sort of hockey lunch in any case. This time, it is about the Olympics in Greece. There was one Australian there and he said it is going to be Australia. But the Netherlands shares the same group with the Kookaburras. So does India. So, it is too early for me to have that Australian confidence.

For me, the most disappointing part of the Olympics hockey is the Malaysian team absence. It is simply too bad Malaysia lost to England earlier during the qualifying round. Malaysia should have beaten the English but pity that this is going to be Malaysia’s first Olympics game without a hockey team in a long time. I wonder whether Malaysian hockey quality has gone down (Malaysia was ranked 10th in the world barely four years ago) or we just got unlucky.

The topic then shifted to India, Bangladesh and the Brahmaputra River. The conversation started off with the current flood crisis in Bangladesh where more than 2000 people have died. A person asked a question about the high casualties number. Somebody explained that Bangladesh is merely a quarter of Michigan Lower Peninsula’s size but has more than 125 million people in it. Therefore, if something happened, many would be involved.

After I got home, I did some research on that just to know more. By comparison, Michigan is about 250 000 km² with only 10 million people and Malaysia has a land area of almost 330 000 km² with only 25 million people. The contrast in density is drastic; Michigan 40 people/km², Malaysia 70 people/km². Bangladesh has a staggering 926 people/km²!

I did not make up the data, unlike the New York Post. All hail to Wikipedia, in my opinion the best online encyclopedia in the world. Give Wikipedia a visit and howl me at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Earth.

The person that asked the question earlier was not satisfied with the answer and pressed on for a better answer. He asked, if the river floods every time, why do people go there at all?

A depressing answer was given. The people of Bangladesh are poor. They have nowhere to go but the river. The delta is rich with alluvial, an extremely fertile type of soil. Their only hope of survival is the river delta. There is no other economic activity but agriculture.

Another question was fired, why don’t they migrate?

That is easy to answer. There is a cost to migration and poor people cannot afford expensive cost. Worse, nobody wants to accept too many Bangladeshis. In fact, nobody wants too many immigrants.

The last question, given the context of the discussion, strengthened my belief in globalization though I am not saying I agree with globalization with its current form. My notion of globalization is the free flow of capital and labor. The free flow of labor is possible for people from the first world and probably from the developing countries too. However, this is not entirely true for the Bangladeshis and the people from third world in general.

If only free flow of labor were possible for all of us regardless of countries, I believe poverty would be less of a problem, less of a crisis. I of course do think some restriction on labor is a must for the sake of the environment and sustainability.

I am thankful that I am not from the Brahmaputra delta. At the same time, I feel sorry for the people of the delta. It is heartbreaking to see people being stuck in such vicious poverty cycle. On the chessboard, it would have been an impasse.

Categories
Economics Environment Poetry

[393] Of the 393rd post

I need to sleep well,
but sleep is a waste of time,
so I will sleep late.

I want to sleep late,
but I will wake up late,
damned be dilemmas.

Damned be my eyes,
why cannot it be closed now?
I want to sleep well.

Still open I see,
and I see everything,
I need not see it.

Close I beg you please,
to see sunlight ere I sleep,
is too much to bare.

p/s – the recycling culture in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Funny how the recycling culture opposition asserts that recycling is a waste of money. Pittsburgh city council on the other hand has this to say:

Costa said failing to recycle costs the city money. It’s paid $11 a ton for glass, cans and plastics and $30 a ton for newspaper, Costa said. Statewide, the average cost to take municipal trash to a landfill is about $57 per ton, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection.

Regardless of that, people who think recycling is wasteful usually forget about the main drive behind recycling: it is about reducing waste, not about making money.

And efficiency includes not merely greenbacks but also includes the utility of having a cleaner environment (unless you like an environment comparable to the dumpyard, maybe a cleaner environment is an griffin good for you) to name one. or the utility of having more trees to name two.

pp/s – BusinessWeek is running an issue on global warming. It is long but nothing is new except the part where the article claims the business sector is ahead of the Bush administration in term of policy and technology concerning global warming.

Categories
Economics Environment History & heritage Politics & government

[392] Of 59 years later

Today is the 59th anniversary of the dropping of the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima. Approximately 80 000 people died on that day and many others in later due to deadly radioactivity. It was the finale of the greatest war in human history.

Let us hope that such weapon may never be used again. The first step to ensure that is to urge the US to adhere to ABM Treaty that it signed more than three decades ago. And the only way to do that is to remove Bush from the White House.

Go Ralph Nader!

Heh.

Anyway, I donated a few bucks to the local Green Party earlier. Hopes it is worth it.

p/s – there is a plan in California for a greater expansion of solar energy:

California officials are proposing that half of all new homes in the state be running on solar energy in 10 years, an effort spurred by $100 million in annual incentives paid for by electricity consumers.

Denmark is known for its wind energy, California will be known for its solar energy.

Categories
Economics

[391] Of $50 per barrel

I have always believed that $50 per barrel of crude oil is possible but for the price reach that level before the year ends is way too soon.

p/s – a must read entry. Extremely hilarious. I had my first smile of the day because of that blog.

Categories
Economics Environment Politics & government

[388] Of DNC, John Kerry and Howard Dean

I will have a vice president who will not conduct secret meetings with polluters to rewrite our environmental laws

– John Kerry, July 29th 2004, Boston.

Nuff’ said.

Anyway, the Republican convention will be on August the 30th if I am not mistaken. It will be interesting to see how the GOP will react to the Democrats’ call for more positive competition instead of a cynical one.

So far, a lot of Bush’s campaign ads on the TV have been trying to discredit Kerry. Kerry has a few too but Kerry has not spent as much as Bush on negative ads.

And after four days of watching the DNC, I say Barack Obama is the best speaker.

Nevertheless, it is quite hard to see who will win the coming election.

On the other day, on the second day to be exact, Howard Dean gave his speech and he said democrats should not be ashamed of being democrats. People were confused with his words but later in an interview on PBS with Jim Lehrer, Dean explained that statement.

He said, people think Clinton got into office because Clinton was more of a centrist rather than a liberal. When he said that, then the “ah” came.

David Brooks, of who was on the show along with Mark Shields, disagreed and stressed later that Clinton won because Clinton took a sort of centrist position instead of a more liberal one.

Howard Dean is probably one of the true Democrats but I have to agree with Brooks. Clinton won because he took a centrist position.

I agree so because there is sort of case in economics that supports Clinton-was-a-centrist argument. It is something like this.

Imagine a one dimension line that represents a beach. At the same time, there are a lot of people on the beach, the sun is up there, clear sky and there are two ice-cream vendors at both end of the beach. Now, people from the right till the middle would go to the right-positioned ice-cream booth while the left-positioned will be visited by people from the left till the middle; this is based on the assumption that distance is the deciding factor on which booth should be visited and price is the same.

Now, if the right booth moved closer to the left while the left booth stayed left, the owner of the moved booth would get more customers. This is true because more people would be closer to the right booth than the left booth. If the right booth shifted straight to the middle while left stayed left, all the people on the right side would go to the right booth and half of the people on the left side of the beach would visit the right booth; the left booth would get only half of what it would have gotten if both booths had stayed at both end of the spectrum.

This is applicable to political party and certainly true in the case where there are two dominant parties. And this certainly dismisses Dean’s suggestion.

Anyway, I heard Ralph Nader has a good chance of getting into Michigan’s ballot. I would love to see Ralph Nader wins but given the situation, I will have to go with John Kerry.