Categories
Activism Economics Environment Photography Politics & government

[486] Of kicking Coke off campus

Earlier today, a rally to kick Coke off campus was held at the Diag. The effort has been going on for a few weeks now and it is being organized by a coalition of student groups. The core members of the coalition are Amnesty International, Environmental Justice and SOLE. There are other supporters like the Student Greens and the Indian Student Association but I can’t remember all of them.

Fair use

The members of the campaign are trying to make the University administration to force Coke to act more responsibly on matters concerning the environment and human rights. In Colombia, a number of labor union leaders that were troublesome to the bottling plants administration have been killed by paramilitary and Coke is alleged to have a connection with the murders. Union members have also been forced to quit their union if they want to keep their jobs – the right to free association being taken away forceful.Pertaining to the environment, in India, Coke is draining an aquifer and in effect depriving the poor local residents of precious water supply. Concurrently in India, there is a major movement to force Coke (and Pepsi too) entirely out of India. Here is a old article from BBC concerning Colas and India.

At the moment, the coalition is trying to get the Michigan Student Assembly to pass a resolution to condemn Coke. The first reading was read yesterday during the MSA weekly meeting and the motion will be up for voting next week. As I understand, heavy lobbying is happening within MSA. Despite the lobbying, I don’t see how the motion won’t go through since most of the board members seem to be from the left side of the political spectrum. With possible support from MSA, it is hoped that the University administration will be pressured to at least renegotiate its contract with Coke. A copy of the resolution can be found here.

While this is going on here in Michigan, other campuses are running the same campaign too. This is actually part of a nationwide protest against Coke. Some of them have managed to convince their schools to quit Coke.

Finally, next week, a few speakers, one of them is from Colombia, will be speaking on how bad the situation is in Colombia.

And now, some photos.

Environmental Justice people made that bottle-link and I helped them with it. It’s 125 feet long and we spent almost two hours trying to get it done. We didn’t buy any of them of course. Buying them to make the link rather defeats the purpose of boycotting Coke.

And this is somebody with the campaign poster. I don’t know him but he is probably from Amnesty.

And this probably somebody from the Michigan Daily, taking a shot at the bottle-link. We at EJ are hoping it gets into the front page tomorrow.

The aftermath. It’s going to be recycled of course.

And an explanation why the bottle-link is 125 feet.

More info on the issue is at Killer Coke.p/s – I’ve learnt that the Daily editorial endorses our effort. w00t! The piece could be read at the Michigan Daily. There is also some hope that the New York Times catches this…

pp/s – today in World of Warcraft, I helped a few others, about 10 players, defending Astranaar, a town in the game, from Orcs’ raids. It feels great to kick orcs’ ass.

Categories
Economics Environment Politics & government

[482] Of State of the Union 2005

Are you folks ready for our annual laugh?

I hope Bush has finally learnt his past mistakes, or else. Five more minutes and oh, I can’t wait to listen to him.

p/s – alright. I take that back. It was good, at least to me and especially how he brought the social security issue to the table. I understand how the social system is flawed but I’m not sure privatization is the right solution. Regardless of that, I prefer one, instead of letting somebody else or the government to finance one’s own future. The current system put the unnecessary burden on the wrong generation.

The environment though, received scant attention. Bush wants to encourage hydrogen fuel – something that he said in his last address. I’m not sure if he is actually trying anything at all though.

He also mentioned about cutting down spending while making tax cut permanent. Heh! Reagan wanted that too. I don’t think cutting down both taxes and spending simultaneously is easy, if impossible is not the right choice of word. It is easier said than done, still.

pp/s – Low Culture is having some fun on Bush. More should be coming, considering how the authors love Bush. I’ve been reading the blog for a couple weeks now and I like it. It’s now under blogroll.

Categories
Economics Sports

[481] Of Man Ure

Every dog has its day. I wish Chelsea godspeed and Man Ure the devilspeed. Must be a bad weekend for both Ajax and Arsenal. At least Ajax didn’t lose.

At the same time, a lot of cruel people are having fun on me. But that is expected of since I always zealously push everything down Manchester United fans’ throat whenever they lose to anybody. It’s only fair to let them have a holiday once or twice during the season.

Thank goodness for people that I meet in person everyday don’t give a damn for soccer. And now I remember why I’m a Manchester-United-hater.

Anyway, Google is running amok.

The earnings were seven times higher than a year earlier on revenue that doubled to more than $1 billion. The news also lifted shares of rival Internet companies Yahoo Inc. (YHOO.O: Quote, Profile, Research) and Ask Jeeves Inc. (ASKJ.O: Quote, Profile, Research) , setting the tone for a possible tech rally on Wednesday.

I wish I were one of the stockholders.

Categories
Economics This blog

[480] Of Ford School Citigroup Lectures

Nobel prize winner and author of the highly regarded Globalization and Its Discontent, Prof. Joseph Stiglitz will be giving a lecture here in Michigan roughly in two weeks time. He and along with two others won the prize for economics in 2001 for their research on asymmetric information.

I’ve read Globalization and Its Discontent long ago but I borrowed it from the library. It is an enlightening book though I do feel the title is a misnomer. It should be International Financial Institutions and Its Discontent or something like that. Nonetheless, I need to buy it, meet the Prof and get it signed!

This time, I promise myself to be at the lecture hall an hour earlier and I’m going to sit in the front row. Maybe second or third but you get the idea. I’m sure the lecture will be as packed as Prof. Noam Chomsky’s and I really hate standing by the door.

Details at Michigan Economics.

And w00t! 500th post. Another 500 to my 1000th post. Also, another 100006505606161000 t0 the 100006505606161500th post – quite meaningless actually.

Categories
Books, essays and others Economics Environment

[476] Of development and the environment, II

In my previous entry, I said that I suspect opportunity cost plays an important role between development and the environment and a country will only turn to environmental issues when it reaches certain economic level. I continued further by saying, a possible correlation between wealth of nations with environmental commitment could be a possible proof.

And guess what?

There actually is an index that could be used as a proxy for environmental commitment. I found this out after browsing the New York Times (reg. req.). It – the Environmental Sustainability Index – is produced by people at Yale and Columbia for the World Economic Forum, first published in 2002 and the 2005 issue has just been released earlier. The 2002 index is located at Columbia University server. Index for 2005 should be up soon.

In general, countries with high GDP per capita have higher ranking when compared to countries with lower GDP per capita.

There are a few wildcards however, like Belgium being 125th out of 142 in the 2002 index and Uruguay at sixth. I had expected a country like Uruguay, which has GDP per capita a bit lower than Malaysia, to be in the middle of the table and Belgium to do much better. The Arab nations, despite their high GDP per capita, linger at the bottom of the pit and they provide seemingly contradicting proof to the idea presented in the previous entry.

Perhaps, their cost of forgone economic benefit is higher than most people. It needs to be said that the opportunity cost idea is valid when all things are equal. The opportunity cost from one subject to the next does vary and this might explain why certain countries differ from their expected ranks. Furthermore, there are several issues with the methodology of the survey and this affects the accuracy of the index. The Times article states a few. One of the them:

He also said a system that rated Russia, whose populated western regions have undergone extraordinary environmental degradation, as having greater environmental sustainability than the United States had inherent weaknesses.

At 33, Russia’s ranking, Mr. Esty said, is in large part a consequence of the country’s vast size. While it “has terrible pollution problems” in the western industrial heartland, he said, its millions of unsettled or sparsely settled acres of Asian taiga mean “it has vast, untrammeled resources and more clean water than anywhere in the world.” So, he added, “on average, Russia ends up looking better than it does to someone who lives in western Russia.”

Alrighty, I’m going for breakfast. I won’t commit myself to any environmental course if my stomach is growling.

p/s – ReMag 5 is out. I’m not quite satisfied with the end product but more tweaks should happen soon.
pp/s – I wanted to play World of Warcraft so badly but the delay is too much for me to handle. I’ve thus canceled the Amazon order.