Categories
Conflict & disaster Economics Environment

[641] Of Malaysian poultry market and bird flu

Bird flu () has now reached Europe. Less than 72 hours ago, British authority has confirmed that the parrot that died in quarantine was infected by the same bird flu that is affecting many birds in a number of countries. Closer to home, another person dies in Indonesia due to the flu. Thailand also has another confirmed death less than 24 hours ago. Malaysia () on the other hand has yet to report any death notwithstanding an earlier quarantine and culling of poultry carried out near the Malaysian-Thai border.

The thing is, in Malaysia, people are preparing for two major celebrations – Eid ul-Fitr and Deepavali. This pushes demand for poultry and chicken up and hence, the high price. What I find surprising however is that, in the light for an expected flu pandemic, prices have yet to fall. At my place near Keramat, Kuala Lumpur, prices are stuck at its ceiling, RM6 per kilogram; a dollar is currently about 3.77 ringgit. Eggs on the other hand are sold at about 26 sen (not cent!) each; I’m unaware of its ceiling though.

The ceilings are set nationwide by the Malaysian Ministry of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs. Some states like Sabah and Sawarak may have different ceilings. Some kind of implicit agreement between traders to not undercut each other is also apparent. However, that’s another story which I’m uninterested this time and unable to talk further given that I don’t know costs faced by chicken traders.

Back to the issue at hand, I’d expect consumers to scale back demand and hence forcing traders to lower their prices. Reason is, consumers should be worried with development surrounding bird flu worldwide and more importantly, regionally. And when consumers have certain concerns on bird flu, they’d be a bit conservative in chicken consumption. Yet, prices haven’t budged by one bit due to bird flu.

I can only think three reasons why prices have gone down yet.

One, the people have full confidence in the government. The Malaysian government has so far done a good job regarding bird flu. They were fast and decisive in that case in the state of Kelantan and this builds up credibility. Even more so when SARS and Nipah virus were successfully handled with aid from the US CDC.

Reason number two is ignorance. Ignorance, as some would say, is bliss. Some people, as unbelievable as it may seem, just couldn’t be bothered to read. Some even can’t differentiate SARS from bird flu and I suspect, many others don’t even know what the hell H5N1 is.

The third is the couldn’t care less attitude. I bet that this is the most probable case for most locals. If this is actually the case, who could blame them. Despite all the developments and the consumption level, Malaysia has yet to encounter a human case unlike Indonesia and Thailand.

Regardless, it would be very interesting to see how price and demand for chicken and other domestic fowls will react in the next few months or even years. If prices are still persistent at ceilings after a full outbreak occurs, Malaysia poises to become a few millions fewer. Needless to say, bad for the labor market but hey, who cares for the labor market, right?

p/s – read this Scientific American’s article on bird flu while you sit quietly at a corner, waiting to ride this expected pandemic out.

pp/s – just found out that there is a Bird Flu Monitor blog.

Categories
Economics Politics & government Society

[639] Of overheard in Ann Arbor

I found Overheard in Ann Arbor via Ann Arbor is Overrated and I’m lovin’ it. And wow, OIAA via AAIO. Talk about coincidence.

Somehow, that site makes me miss Ann Arbor and undergrad life even more. I’m reserving a spot for OIAA in my blogroll. It, together with AAIO, is now immortalized. Sort of. And McDonald’s sucks.

Also, this might be old but Berkeley is trying to tell Ann Arbor something

Anyway, for the sake of making the bear happy, I am neutral on the Miers nomination.

p/s – Ben Bernanke is the next Fed chairman. Who’s Bernanke? Don’t ask me.

Categories
Economics Environment

[632] Of Malaysian environmental law and inflation

Several days ago, Malaysian press highlighted a case in which a Malayan tiger was cut up into pieces and stored inside a refrigerator.

Fair use.

Tiger is an officially recognized endangered species worldwide. This killing should take any nature lover up to arms. However, what riles me up further is the weak punishment:

It is an offence to possess tiger meat and an offender could be jailed up to five years or fined up to RM15,000.

Tiger trafficking is a lucrative black-market trade as body parts of the animal could be processed into traditional medicine in countries such as Thailand and China. Each animal is said to fetch between RM20,000 and RM30,000.

I’m not sure if the possessor of the tiger carcass was indeed the poacher but if he is, imagine if he had gotten away with the prize – he will, on average, be better off.

Say there’s a 50-50 chance of being caught and getting away. Also, assume that if the person’s found guilty, then he or she will face maximum fine of RM15,000. At the same time, if he gets away, the person will receive RM20,000. RM20,000 is the lower limit of the range given by the news report.

Hence, his expected gain will be RM2,500. This might be a simple binomial model but it tells me that this particular environmental law does not sufficiently deal with environmental crime. I mean, come on. On average, a person is actually being rewarded for breaking the law.

It’s worth noting that the same scenario is applicable to the logging industry. I realize that way back in 2004.

I suspect that when most Malaysian environmental laws were first enacted, the monetary punishment was indeed high. However, the real value of the monetary penalties has been progressively eroded by inflation. In fact, I believe this is the case for Malaysian animal protection laws too.

According to Selangor chapter of Malaysian Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA), penalties for animal abuse is too low. These two cases are perfect illustration:

SPCA Calls for Harsher Penalties for Animal Abuse
Following the recent two cases brought to Court by Jabatan Haiwan Enforcement Officers (DVS), SPCA is appealing to the Courts and the Law makers and decision makers to take into account the seriousness of these cases and the inadequate penalties at present are being issued.

The first case, a Breeder in Cheras was fined RM200 for cruelty to 13 dogs, the charge was expected to be for each individual dog (i.e. 13 X RM200) and the lack of a ban of keeping animals after prosecution for cruelty means that each dog was returned to the owner to continue a life of suffering and production.

The second case, a Daschund named Tim, was chained so tightly round his neck that the chain had become embedded into the skin and a six inch wound exposed a bloody mess around his neck. The owner in this case was fined RM200 and had to spend one day in jail. The dog is to be returned to the owner. Tim is still recovering from his injury and several operations to remove the chain from his neck.

SPCA is currently running a campaign to convince the Malaysian government to amend Malaysian Animal Ordinance 1953 and introduce harsher penalties. The law was first enacted in 1953 and 52 years are definitely enough for inflation to render the law toothless.

The bottom line is that inflation cannot be ignored. Failure to recognize the inflationary impact on these set of laws will result in failure to curb environmental crime. This in the end underlines the need for lawmakers to talk in real term. But lawmakers and many others never do. I wonder why.

p/s – this person has a talent for trouble. And a talent for retardness too.

pp/s – a father names his son Oliver Google Kai as a tribute to Google.

Categories
Economics

[628] Of have we gone passed some kind of second derivative for oil demand fuction?

How high will price be before consumers cut back demand for crude oil? I asked the same question more than a year ago.

It seems that USD70 per barrel is the price. My gut tells me that the prices which demand turned direction is lower due to lag. Probably in the range of USD60 to USD70 per barrel. Even before that, SUV sales had decreased tremendously.

Crude oil prices at the New York Mercantile Exchange for November delivery hover around USD62 per barrel while November Brent lingers at USD59 per barrel. The fall in crude prices started during early September after prices reached USD70 per barrel in last August. The fall is happening in spite of production capacity loss due to Hurricance Katrina.

So, are we going to see continuing fall in prices?

The looming winter in the US and Europe is expected to be colder than usual. Unless prices could cushion its rise during the upcoming winter, I don’t expect this price decrease would continue unabated.

But some innovations might help reduce demand of crude oil just like what happened during oil crisis in the 70s. Malaysia is planning to mix biofuel with gas while hydrid vehicles are hot in the US. Still, we may only know for certain where we are when the northern winter ends in April next year (May for People’s Republic of Ann Arbor).

Whatever it is, a falling demand is a bad thing for OPEC. They do have the incentive to increase production to lower prices a bit. The last time crude oil prices broke some records, oil became really cheap for about two decades because fuel consumption efficiency was forced to increase.

p/s – wow! Deja vu!

Categories
Economics Politics & government

[627] Of where is the anti-corruption agency?

So, Mohamed Isa Abdul Samad has been found guilty of corruption by UMNO disciplinary committee weeks ago. He made an appeal and the committee reduces his penalty.

However, why the case hasn’t been brought up to anti-corruption agency? Am I missing something here? Is federal law inapplicable to a political party’s internal matter?

p/s – two persons won the Prize in Economics for “having enhanced our understanding of conflict and cooperation through game-theory analysis”.