Categories
Books, essays and others Economics

[738] Of Liar’s Poker by Michael Lewis

Last October, I brought three paperbacks. Just last week, while I was rollicking, most of the daytime anyway, by the Dungun River, I managed to finished up Liar’s Poker by Michael Lewis .

scanned by Mohd Hafiz Noor Shams. Fair use.

It’s really a good comedy – and tragedy – about bond traders. Bonds as in economic debt of course. Despite the economic background of this real life story at Wall Street in the 90s of the 80s, one doesn’t need to know economics to appreciate the book and its humor. And it had been a long time since I laughed so hard reading a book.

There are several memorable scenes in it. This is one of them:

One trader remembers that “Lewie would say he thought the market was going up, and buy a hundred million [dollar-worth of] bonds. The market would start to go down. So Lewie would buy two billion more bonds, and of course the market would then go up. After he had driven the market up, Lewie would turn to me and say, ‘See I told you it was going up’…”

Another one:

“…Actually there was one good reason for using the charts: Everyone else did. If you believed that large sums of money were about to be invested on the basis of a chart, then, as dumb as it made you feel, it made sense to look at that chart; perhaps it would enable you to place your bet first and get in front of the coming wave. Many of our French and English speculators, however, honestly believed the charts contained the secrets of the market. They are aboriginal chartists. They would have used the charts even if no one else did. They communed with their charts as if they were Ouija boards. The charts were speaking to them.”

It maybe a typical dry economics humor but it’s funny nonetheless.

Regarding the second block quote, it is especially true about people in the stock market nowadays. A broker a couple of months back talked to me about forecasting. I looked at him and said quietly in my mind, trying to be polite, are you for real? Eh, I ended up explaining efficient market theory to him. And he wanted to sell me stocks.

Really, in economics, the best future price, given perfect information, is the price today. All those forecastings are bullshit. The only reason charting works is because laymen actually believe in those charts and then force the market to go the way the forecasters had forecasted. It’s a self-fulfilled prophecy. I still laugh at people that actually believe all the bullshits spew by so-called forecasters. Even the forecasters know its bullshit. Well, the forecasters with real economic know-how anyway. Some people may argue that information is not perfect. Yeah. True. But all know insider trading is illegal, eh?

Now, it’s time for me to get on with my reading. In my mind, there are three candidates currently.

One is Stiglitz’s The Roaring Nineties – I’ve read his Globalization and Its Discontent; yup, that Nobel Prize for economics winner; even attended his lecture at Michigan!). It has a cool cover by the way.

Two is Hujan Pagi by A. Samad Said. A. Samad Said needs no introduction in Malay literature and Hujan Pagi won, I think, the 1987/88 Malaysian literature award, or something like that. I’ve never read any proper Malay work so, I thought, if not now, when? But I’ve actually started the first page or two. I however find it hard to keep my interest alive – it was like when I first read Lord of the Rings (I must stress – before it came to the cinema, years earlier! I’m not a person that read a book because the book makes it to the movies – with the exception of , er, Star Wars. Star Wars is just different). Tough read in the first few chapters but as the story develops, well, we all know why Lord of the Rings is so successful in the cinemas.

Third is Thomas Friedman’s The World Is Flat. I’ve been wanting to read it since early last year but I kept getting myself sidetracked with other books and responsibilities.

So, we’ll see.

p/s – Mathematical art. Parental guidance is required. Sort of. Depending on point of view of course. (via)

Categories
Economics Environment Poetry

[723] Of haiku on ocean and maybe, on Proton too

In bid to win $20 worth of Greenpeace merchandizes. Haiku on ocean! In Malay though:

Di ufuk sana,
biru laut memikat,
mengejar mimpi.

Roughly means, still in 5-7-5 format!

On the horizon,
the blue ocean calling us,
us, chasing a dream.

Anyway, there is a very high possibility that I will travel go to Terengganu next week and lend a hand to a conservation project . Well, a project cum holidays. I’m pretty much excited because it’s been more than ten years since I last bathe in the South China Sea. And sitting by the South China Sea, I will be vomiting more lame haikus for all to suffer!

The only thing I might about travelling to Terengganu is that, there is no rail service. And I don’t wanna drive either. So, looks like bus for me. Seven hours in a bus won’t be too kind to my ass.

While in the bus, penning a haiku or two for Proton might be something to distract me from boredom. Why Proton on all the sudden? Well, instaed of Volkswagen, Proton has a new ally; Mitsubishi. Again.

Mitsubishi Motors to form new tie-up with Malaysia’s Proton

38 minutes ago

TOKYO (AFP) – Struggling Japanese automaker Mitsubishi Motors will form a new tie-up with Proton that would help the embattled Malaysian carmaker develop new models, a newspaper reports.

The tie-up will include a technology transfer, mutual supply of auto parts, including engines, and allow Proton to create new models, the Asahi Shimbun reported, quoting unnamed company sources.

It has only been about about two years since since Proton and Mitsubishi last decided to part ways.

Proton and Mitsubishi should just marry each other. Enough with the flirting already. Hell, let’s do one haiku for Proton now.

Hail Mitsubishi!
A setting red giant star,
trying to save us.

Categories
Economics Humor

[716] Of 2006 World Economic Forum main discussion

With the World Economic Forum going on , let’s all be honest to ourselves and call a spade a spade. In reality, the world economy works like this:

Americans do the research and create something new.

Australians praise American ingenuity.

Southeast Asians accuse Australians of sucking up and then look at Japan for help.

Japanese innovate and make something better.

Germans introduce an efficient plan to produce it.

Chinese make it at almost no cost.

Arabs supply the fuel and some verbal abuses.

Israelis complain about the abuses.

French and Brits talk about it, end up arguing with each other and then do nothing.

Europeans undertake extended holidays even when they’re supposed to work.

Everybody else goes to work and then discovers that they need to call customer service.

Indians fill all call centers and take care of customer service.

Latin Americans refuse to believe what’s going on and party instead.

Africans don’t know what’s going on and get fucked.

At the World Economic Forum, the people there are trying to find out how the Africans are getting fucked.

Categories
Economics Environment

[711] Of Lim Keng Yaik says you must lower your fee or we’ll give you market power?

I might have heard the news wrongly and I’m neither a Malaysian telcos industry expert nor a not-so-casual observer. Nevertheless, while I was lying on my stomach and effortlessly switching channels, I came across a news report over TV3 about broadband infrastructures owners charging users exorbitant fee (access fee maybe?). These users, I presume, in context anyway, are broadband internet service providers,

The relevant minister, Lim Keng Yaik, through the clip, was almost angry and visibly frustrated at the owners. These owners, judging from excerpt of Keng Yaik’s speech, sound like monopolies. So, it’s safe to assume they act as monopolies too. Monopoly leads to inefficient pricing which in turn leads to inefficient outcome and, in this case, prevents greater broadband penetration in Malaysia. Current Malaysian broadband penetration rate is low and the government wants to change that. As Lim Keng Yaik’s ministry is responsible for telecommunication sectors in Malaysia, I understand his frustration.

I felt a sort of empathy for him until I heard – think I heard, rather – he said, if the owners refuse to cooperate with the government in lowering the fee, the government will stop issuing more broadband licenses. Now, I’m not sure what kind of license he was talking about. But it seems, through context again, he was referring to the permits for laying down broadband infrastuctures like fiber optics and stuff. If what I heard is true, then this is bad economics .

The problem is monopoly and a monopoly charges higher price for its good compared to a competitive firm. If the government stop issuing the licenses, wouldn’t that would actually reward the monopolies instead of punishing them?

I mean, halting the license issuance would effectively guarantee the existing infrastructures owners of market power.

If license doesn’t refer to the owners but instead refers to ISPs however, then maybe the punishing plan might work. Stoppage of the license issuance to ISPs would deprive owners of broadband infrastructure of revenue. But then, that wouldn’t help broadband penetration in Malaysia at all.

And if what he said actually meant stopping issuing licenses to existing owners, then that might make better sense. In fact, I think, this is the case.

Right now, I hope I heard it all wrong. I can’t find anything off the internet yet. So, I can’t confirm what Lim Keng Yaik said or meant but I’m sure a report will pop up somewhere within the next 24 hours. I’ll do a postscript entry here once the report is out. Stay tuned.

p/s – wow. 3,000 tonnes at all three sites. Sounds like Malaysia needs to bring down the cost of safely dumping waste legally fast.

Categories
ASEAN Economics Liberty

[706] Of Cambodian dictatorship and ASEAN

Malaysia and several other ASEAN members have been criticizing Myanmar for the latter’s lack of meaningful democratic progress. To the southeast beyond Thailand, lies Cambodia with a dictator is in the making. Despite Cambodia’s alarming progress towards dictatorship, ASEAN leaders are yet to say a word about it.

For the past few days, Cambodian government have been arresting Cambodians critical of the government on the ground of defamation. The arrest has sparked condemnation from several organization, including Amnesty International. AI in its press release accuses the Cambodian government of manipulating Cambodian courts. The New York Times in one of its articles says that this is not an isolated incident. Opposition leaders and others have been arrested by the government. This makes these arrests as a part of a larger erosion of freedom in Cambodia:

Cambodian Leader Cracks Down in Bid to Solidify Power
By SETH MYDANS
Published: January 9, 2006

PHNOM PENH, Cambodia, Jan. 8 – The harshest political crackdown in years is under way here in what some analysts are calling the final stage in Prime Minister Hun Sen’s drive to consolidate unchallenged power.

Over the past year, he has choked off the last effective political opposition while continuing to marginalize the monarchy, manipulate the courts and intimidate labor unions and other civic groups. In December, the leader of the only significant opposition party, Sam Rainsy, who had already fled the country, was sentenced in absentia to 18 months in prison for criminal defamation.

Now, with a series of arrests and lawsuits on defamation and related charges, Mr. Hun Sen is for the first time directly attacking the human rights groups that, by default, serve as a de facto democratic opposition…

ASEAN has a unique role to apply pressure against Cambodia. The 10-member confederation could admonish the Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen and perhaps, put a check on current Cambodian political atmosphere. But it is not doing so and I think I know why they are silent on the matter.

ASEAN takes pride of its non-interference policy but it makes an exception for Myanmar thanks to US and EU initiative. Unlike Myanmar, the European Union and United States are not pushing ASEAN to deal with Cambodia accordingly. With no outside push, ASEAN seems happy to stay away from making a comment on its members. Well, I think it’s just wrong and ASEAN needs to make a statement on Cambodia.

The reason for such need is simple – it’s the ASEAN Charter which guarantees human rights. Though the Charter has yet to be drafted, this is a chance for ASEAN to prove to the world and more importantly, to its own citizens that the charter will not be just another piece of paper. If ASEAN fails to speak up against Cambodia, it will be harder to deal with such case in the future even when the Charter is in place.

Then, of course, besides the lack of outside pressure, another reason why ASEAN is not doing anything about the issue is because its more prosperous members, particularly Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, are not quite saints when it comes to human rights.

p/s – Volkswagen ends partnership with Proton. So, Proton is going to keep Lotus after all.