Categories
ASEAN Humor

[570] Of Malaysian imperialism… err… federalism: Sumatra

Let’s be frank. Indonesian Sumatra is a pain in the ass. Anything that happens in Sumatra affects Malaysia. Any Indonesian action, or rather lack of, which concerns Sumatra, produces externality on Malaysia. Two clear examples are illegal land clearing via open burning and piracy in the Malacca Straits.

Granted, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore are responsible for the security in Malacca Straits. Yet, with vast undeveloped and swampy area in eastern Sumatra, Indonesia will need to do a lot more than what Malaysia and Singapore have been doing all along. Unfortunately for us all, Indonesia doesn’t have that kind of resources to start with. Subsequently, Indonesia’s inability to act within its own domain is producing negative externalities on its neighbors.

Malaysia, along with Brunei and Singapore are probably the most stable nations in Southeast Asia. Indonesia’s relative inability to act however is a threat to the three stable states. One way to stabilize the region is to internalize all Indonesian Sumatra’s problems, including their environmental and security mess.

Yes, in other words, one mean to solve all these problems is by making it exclusively our problems. Malaysia will need to encourage and convince all Sumatran states, perhaps including Aceh, into joining the Malaysian Federation. Once that happens, Malaysia will be able to make sure haze and even piracy along the busiest waterway in the world are things of the past. Apart from internalizing the environmental and piracy threat, imagine the wealth that will be made available to the Federation. More crude oil for us all, timbers, fishes, all the minerals. It will be as if Malaysia has just stumbled upon El Dorado.

Of course, the main issue remains the 250,000-strong Tentera Nasional Indonesia along with its pool of almost 60 million people according to CIA’s The World Factbook. In event of war, Malaysia’s only hope is for Indonesian fragile economy to collapse along with its cranking warships. If war ever broke up, an appropriate comparison would be the Iran-Iraq War where Iran had vast military reserve but with aging equipment while Iraq’s small but well-equipped force. The war was a stalemate but hey, Indonesia declared war on Malaysia back in the 1960s but we along with our allies kicked Jakarta and the commies’ ass. So, we might actually have a chance against Indonesia.

And hey! We know how hawkish Indonesia could be. Let’s see if they have the muscle to match their “ganyang Malaysia” spirit. After all, it was our frigate that rammed into an Indonesia’s warship in the name of Malaysian sovereignty over a piece of land under the Sunda Sea and Indonesia couldn’t do anything but accussed Malaysia of bullying them. And I doubt Indonesia has even repaired that warship.

But then, let’s give Indonesia’s retaliation a blind eye, assume that Indonesia’s economy will collapse, there will be no backlash from the international community and we all have nine lives. With so many assumptions, you’ve probably realized that I’m an economics graduate. Regardless, assuming Brunei accepts a re-invitation to join Malaysia as the new 14th state:

The new Malaysian Federation will look something like:

And we’ll probably need a new flag too. Our current flag would have too few lines. Unless, Sumatra is decreed as the fourth Federal Territory! Yeah, that’s more like it. We would be able to keep our pseudo-American flag! w00t!

O say does that Jalung Gemilang yet wave…
O’er land of meritokrasi, and the home of boleh.

Heh. Selangor should be particularly happy – the federal government would have little reason to appeal to Selangor for more land.

Or, instead of invading them, maybe Indonesia should just sign the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution.

Next entry on Malaysian federalism: Pattani.

p/s – I’ve just read Utusan Malaysia and someone finally mentioned about the haze agreement. But, heh, there are seven countries that have ratified the treaty, not six. Somebody needs to check his fact…

Categories
Humor Liberty

[564] Of truth is stranger than fiction

From Samizdata:

The bureaucratic mind at work, from the WSJ Political Diary:

Before deploying from Savannah, Georgia to Iraq by a chartered airliner, the troops of the 48th Brigade Combat Team, a National Guard unit, had to go through the same security checks as any other passengers. Lt. Col. John King, the unit’s commander, told his 280 fellow soldiers that FAA anti-hijacking regulations require passengers to surrender pocket knives, nose hair scissors and cigarette lighters. ‘If you have any of those things,’ he said, almost apologetically, ‘put them in this box now.’ The troops were, however, allowed to keep hold of their assault rifles, body armour, helmets, pistols, bayonets and combat shotguns” — reported in the Air Finance Journal.

What can I say?

Categories
ASEAN Humor

[546] Of Malaysian imperialism… er… federalism

Malaysia was first accused as an agent of imperialism by Indonesia, and to a certain extent by the Philippines, back during the formation of Malaysian Federation. Both were against the formation of Malaysia which was supposed to encompass the Federation of Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak, Brunei and Sabah. War between Malaysia and Indonesia ensued later. In the end, Malaysia somehow won though Indonesia in the process managed to convince Brunei to opt out of the federation. Later, Singapore seceded, or kicked out of Malaysia, in 1965. And Malaysia has gone a long way since.

Now, in a time of uncertainty, it’s time Malaysia expands its frontier again. Yea!

We could definitely start with Brunei. The reason Brunei refused to participate in Malaysia was because of Indonesian influence. The rest is history. Today, Indonesia struggles to hold its own territories together and Indonesia’s influence on Brunei certainly has been reduced to nil. Hence, this is a perfect timing for Malaysian federal government to initiate talk with the Sultan of Brunei of a possible ascension of Brunei into Malaysia.

The benefit of Brunei’s ascension for Malaysia is aplenty. I’ll try to explain three of them.

First and foremost, such unification would increase trade by removing barriers that distort trade. Malaysian trade increase would probably be insignificant due to Brunei’s size but Brunei would definitely enjoy greater reap in term of percentage of GDP.

Second concerns natural resources, in particular crude oil and gas. What better way for Malaysia to secure a source of energy in light of rising oil price? Brunei could be the answer to Malaysia’s thirst for the black gold.

Thirdly, Spratly. Spratly is being claimed by multiple countries in the region, including Malaysia and Brunei. Brunei’s accession into Malaysia would strengthen Malaysia and Brunei’s case. And of course, with Spratly comes along superior inflow of black oil into Brunei and ultimately, should Brunei join the federation, Malaysia itself.

Should Brunei join Malaysia, certain arrangement could be made to soften the impacts of ascension. For instance, the Sultan of Brunei and Brunei itself could be given certain autonomy power, perhaps a power more generous than what both Sabah and Sarawak currently enjoy. Whatever the possible division of power between Brunei and Malaysia may be, in the long run, Brunei should embrace democracy complete with its participation in the Malaysian Parliament with the Sultan’s authority being balanced by the interest of common Bruneian (Do we call Bruneian as Bruneian?).

Steps towards the unification of Brunei and Malaysia could be done in the near future. Or, if it couldn’t, it would definitely be viable when oil in Brunei ran out. When Brunei ran out of its natural resources, it will be in Brunei’s best interest to join Malaysia.

Nice eh? Next time, we’ll talk other possibilities of strengthening out beloved federation.

So, before:

After:

For a greater Federation!p/s – hail to the Rainbow Warrior! 20 years ago on this day, the French government sabotaged a Greenpeace vessel. One died.

pp/s – the reasons I read Samizdata.net are here and here and here.

Categories
Economics Gaming Humor

[529] Of auctioning in World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft in-game economy is confusing to say the least. To be fair, it’s confusing at the first glance and it will make sense after awhile.

While I was browsing an in-game auction house for materials that I needed to brew a few potions, I found that that the price of the end product is lower than the total cost of materials needed to make the end product. I’ve heard about this phenomenon earlier in World of Warcraft forum but never really had the curiosity to investigate it myself. I was more interested in killing some other players and brag about it. But

For instance, to make a major healing potion, one needs mountain silversage, two golden sansams and a crystal vial. When I checked the price of silversage, it was priced at 99 silver (1 gold = 100 silver = 1000 copper). According to a census by Allakhazam, the average price is 72 silver. A sansam costs 39 silver on average while a crystal vial cost 20 silver from an NPC vendor.

And guest how much, on average, does it cost to buy a major healing potion.

If you’d guess around 1.70 gold (which comes from 72 + (39*2) + 20), you’re wrong. On average, the potion costs just 1 gold.

Funny isn’t it?

This sort of pricing is ruining my in-game profession, which is an alchemist. I gather all the materials and make those materials into potions. Most of the time, I buy the materials instead of looking for them. Gathering the materials takes extensive effort.

By looking at the current trend, it seems that I should simply collect the materials and immediately later, sell them straight to the market instead of using up the materials for potions and then offer the market the end product. This is a way to get around the weirdness of the in-game economy. But it certainly doesn’t explain the anomaly of the economy.

One explanation for what seems to be a weird pricing is that some sellers actually gather (or in fact, gotten it for free) the material instead of buying it off from someone else. With that, their cost, strictly speaking from monetary perspective while ignoring the effort needed to search for the materials, is lower than those that get their material from the market.

This explanation makes perfect sense. However, I wouldn’t these people that gathered the material by themselves gain higher mark-up if they had priced their items as if they had bought it from the market? Shouldn’t more profit and more gold be the goal? Moreover, these sellers don’t seem to add their effort into the price, which is ludicrous. As if, their effort shouldn’t be rewarded. Or maybe they just have different preferences, which is generally lower than those that think like me.

Because of these people, which I call “deflationers”, prices of everything related to alchemy are deflated, save those highest levels potions. In the end, every decent alchemist is forced to sell at lower prices.

Then, I realized, this is game theory, with a pun.

p/s – Leeeeeerrrroooooyyyyy Jeeeenkiiinnsss. Warning, large vid file. 16 meg.

Categories
Economics Humor

[525] Of crisis of the pockets

I’m a person that always carries a camera with me; that one pocket filled. Then I bought an mp3 player and bring it to almost anywhere with me; another pocket filled. Usually, I put in my keys along with the mp3 player on the same side of my pant.

I wore a pant with three pockets yesterday. My wallet made the third pocket full.

And then I bought a cell phone. Never really wanted it nor needed it until I moved to an apartment 14 floors scaling up the charming blue May sky that was plagued with December cloud and wind just a few days earlier. The apartment has everything but a phone. So, I figured, I needed a phone. Well, my friend had some influence in that decision but that’s not the point.

When I received the phone from the sales representative, I found something odd was happening – I was out of pockets! It might be just a problem of the uglier sex; I don’t know about the fairer one. I don’t think girls have pockets at all, all the time; or at most maybe just two pockets, most of the time. No pocket. It must be sucked to be a girl-wearing-dress. Boy, it’s hard to not to digress.

Anyway, moments after that awkward moment, I realized that I had with me too many gadgets. I usually bring a couple electronics with me and in the future, I would probably carry more along – laptop, PDA, crab, crap – all the stuff that I plan to purchase soon. Hence, this crisis of the pockets hits hard on me.

Why this is a crisis?

Imagine this – increasing demand for pockets with a constant supply of it. This could only mean one thing – shortage of pockets! I should be paying for more pockets. Heck, I should kill for more pockets!

I’ve come to one conclusion – I need cargo pants and a small bag for future cool gadgets. Pant with three pockets is obsolete. Demanding to wear a three-pocket pant in the light of increasing number of fun stuff is bad. Actually, it’s not too bad stuffing all in that three pockets. It is uncomfortable nevertheless.

I need a pocket subsidy to finance my more-pocket plan. But of course, there is no such thing as a pocket subsidy, or is it? If there is, I should well damn take it. If those people back in Malaysia can have their oil subsidy, I want my pocket subsidy too!