{"id":5931,"date":"2010-01-04T17:28:17","date_gmt":"2010-01-04T06:28:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/maddruid.com\/?p=5931"},"modified":"2010-01-10T00:48:28","modified_gmt":"2010-01-09T13:48:28","slug":"2144-of-libertarian-position-on-the-allah-controversy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maddruid.com\/?p=5931","title":{"rendered":"[2144] Of libertarian position on the Allah controversy"},"content":{"rendered":"

I have nothing clever to say with respect to the controversy involving the usage of the term Allah by Christians in Malaysia (specifically,\u00a0Catholic\u00a0Christians I suppose) and objection raised by considerable number of Muslims there.[1]<\/small><\/sup><\/a><\/a> What I have to say is just some plain old consequences arising from my libertarian position. I think I have somewhat clarified my position while trying to explain, what I think is why some more conservative Muslims in Malaysia object to the use of the term Allah by Christians<\/a> in Malaysia.<\/p>\n

In any case, I am going to explain my position.<\/p>\n

From the principle of freedom, specifically religious freedom and more broadly, freedom of expression, there is no reason for me to be alarmed by the recent court decision to allow Christians to use the term Allah to refer to their god in Malaysia. For any group to claim exclusive right over an idea that cannot be, in a sense, privatized or perhaps \u2014 however ridiculous this may sound \u2014 trademarked, is problematic. I cannot quite find the right words to describe it but clearly, no individual liberty has been\u00a0transgressed\u00a0by this action taken by Christians. Meanwhile, to prevent Christians from doing so will violate their liberty, and therefore should be\u00a0untenable\u00a0for libertarians.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, based on the concept of secularism, which I consider as an essential aspect of the libertarian concept of the state<\/a>, the state should have no role in this at all. So, to me, the court decision is only right. If the court had ruled otherwise, it would call for government intervention in form of religious control in the society.<\/p>\n

Not only that, that government intervention will expand the frontier of the state into private life of a person. Just imagine the kind of mechanism required to enforce a ruling that insists the term Allah belongs exclusively to Muslims and no one else in Malaysia. Well, actually, you do not have to imagine it. It is already in place.<\/p>\n

Lastly, this conflict paints both Christianity and Islam in Malaysia in a bad light: those Christians who insist in using the term Allah when there are other alternatives and conservative Muslims for their\u00a0schizophrenic attitude. It is true that the Christian insistence does not violate liberty but hey, a lot of things a lot of people say and do do not violate liberty either. Whether all those things are the smart things to do or say is another matter altogether, even within libertarian constraint.<\/p>\n

\"Mohd \"Mohd \"Mohd<\/p>\n

[1]<\/sup><\/a><\/a> \u2014 Dec. 31 (Bloomberg) — Malaysia\u2019s High Court ruled that a government ban on non-Muslim publications using the word \u201dAllah\u201d\u009d is unconstitutional, settling a dispute that stoked questions about religious freedom in the country.<\/small><\/p>\n

The Herald, a weekly publication of the Catholic Church of Malaysia, filed for a judicial review after it was temporarily ordered to stop publishing for two weeks in December 2007 after using the word, which means \u201dGod,\u201d\u009d in its Malay-language section. [Malaysia Court Rules Catholic Paper Can Print \u201d\u02dcAllah\u2019<\/em><\/a>. Manirajan Ramasamy. Ranjeetha Pakiam. Bloomberg. December 31 2009]<\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I have nothing clever to say with respect to the controversy involving the usage of the term Allah by Christians in Malaysia (specifically,\u00a0Catholic\u00a0Christians I suppose) and objection raised by considerable number of Muslims there.[1] What I have to say is just some plain old consequences arising from my libertarian position. I think I have somewhat […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,11],"tags":[364,1050,347,1051,68,1737,1000,1052,252,1060],"class_list":["post-5931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberty","category-society","tag-allah","tag-christianity","tag-freedom-of-expression","tag-god","tag-islam","tag-libertarianism","tag-minarchism","tag-religious-freedom","tag-secularism","tag-the-herald"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maddruid.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maddruid.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maddruid.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maddruid.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maddruid.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5931"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/maddruid.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5931\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5975,"href":"https:\/\/maddruid.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5931\/revisions\/5975"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maddruid.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maddruid.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maddruid.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}